Bush for lying and getting us into an unjust war.
2006-11-19 09:36:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by JS 3
·
5⤊
3⤋
Point in fact niether.
Lieing about a BJ does not raise to high crimes and mistemeanors enough to remove the man from an elected position. I don't care if it was under oath or not, this is the President we are talking about. Lieing about say, selling nuclear weapons technology to the Russians thats different, I can't believe our government was bogged down by that crap. And I wrote my representitives at the time voicing my oppinion as well.
Bush might seem over bearing but I see him doing nothing unconstitutional. Remember, the whole world thought Iraq had WMDs and the UN santioned our action in Iraq. Looking over congress there is no clear consencus there either. When in doubt err on the side of the people, Bush was elected, no impeachment. Disagreeing with a policy does not make it illegal.
2006-11-19 17:47:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by JFra472449 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
When Clinton lied no body died! He was impeached but that was over turned because it was an illegal impeachment because Clinton did not endanger the people of this country he lied abut having an affair with a pretty young woman just like most men Or women for that matter would do if caught. I don't want to see Bush impeached because then Cheney will be our Pres. No I'd rather be stuck with Bush for the next tow years.I don't think Bush has values or he wouldn't have lied to get our youth to give up their lives for this war.
2006-11-19 17:45:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pamela V 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Clinton lied under oath which is an impeachable offense and he was. Bush hasn't committed an impeachable offense therefore he will not be impeached. The reason the dims want to impeach Bush is they haven't gotten over loosing to him in 2000 and 2004.
2006-11-19 17:40:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jean R 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Clinton. He lied to America, Bush, contrary to the opinion of, um, retards, didn't. Bush is trying to get rid of terrorists, and you morons don't seem to understand that terrorists will kill you to if they get the chance. His wiretapping is allowed by Congress. He didn't start a war on false premises. Clinton knew about 9/11 and didn't bother to say anything, so he is therefore a terrorist who needs to be pooped on by a fat guy.
2006-11-19 17:46:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by daniel g 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Dude man OJ like got off Dude Lawyers can like score for anything Dude.
When I got busted for cooking at my cook house the lawyer like said No Way and I like am still cooking Man
2006-11-19 17:38:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gee, let me see- duh! You don't have a clue do you? It's so easy when you buy up the medias views on everything rather than get to the truth of matters but I guess that would involve a little work and some brain power!
2006-11-19 17:41:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both!! And stop stealing material from Doonesbury.!!
(Most of the stuff for this question came from this mornings strip.)
2006-11-19 18:17:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Carlos D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many sperm cells died as a result of dry cleaning on the blue dress that Monica wore? Huh? Huh?
How many babies (littlle Clintons) would that spot have made?
Therefore, Clinton is more EVIL.
2006-11-19 17:42:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I vote that you will see all repukes here disagreeing with you. They have a rather warp sense of values and reality.
2006-11-19 17:38:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by childrenofthecorn 4
·
2⤊
0⤋