Is it not true that international aid does not work? Why not just stop it and let countries work for progress?

Answer 1

Yes. It is true. We don't stop the aid because:
1) Our government thinks "it looks good" to give foreign aid.They might claim that there is some "political" motive in giving The aid.
2) Some Americans get an ego trip out of it.
3) Some bureaucrats get in on the graft and corruption that goes on all the time. There's a lot of taxpayer money on the table (or under it) and these guys want some of it. Call it GREED.
4) They don't care if only 10 cents out of every dollar goes for the intended purpose.
5) Some people mistakenly see it as "humanitarian" , but in reality, it's just Band-aids, holding the recipients back from coming up with permanent solutions.
6) After all, their bureaucrats are in on the graft and corruption, too. And they want to keep it going.

Answer 2

No, that is not true at all. International aid is essential, because the people of some countries are almost totally helpless or are being killed, raped, and tortured by agents of their own governments. Iraq was one of these under Saddam. Yugoslavia (Serbia/Croatia) was another under Milosevic. You now see and hear about Darfur and the Janjaweed nearly every day on the news (anyone who pays any attention).

Of course there are problems, including the corruption of governments at the receiving end, and sometimes inefficiency and even corruption at this end. Still, anyone with a conscience and a belief in any kind of a God has to help the least of their neighbors. As Mother Teresa said: "A life spent without helping others is a life not worth living".

Answer 3

It depends on the type of aid given. Nowadays the focus of NGOs is often on encouraging self-sustainability, such as giving small grants to local people to establish businesses. Aid is still necessary: it's difficult for a country to work for progress if its people cannot even afford to go to school. Or if we look at HIV/AIDS affected countries - professionals like teachers can be dying quicker than they can be replaced. In the past, the type of aid given was probably misguided, and also siphoned off by corrupt rulers. A more grassroots-orientated focus is needed but this does not reduce the need for international assistance.

Answer 4

International aid is probably oil money stolen from those same countries. Imagine one big country supporting a dictator of a little country by selling him arms and financially supporting his regeme, that dictator may let the bigger country have oil fields all over his country for a share of the profits, and anyone who protests is killed. While the bigger country has a vested intrest in the smaller country they can 'appear' to be seen to be doing something.

Answer 5

we could no longer ignore what 'foreign places help' certainly is, if its money sent type government to government its certainly approximately keeping a rustic stabilised that we've a strategic pastime in. Take Sierra Leone, Britain has a great stake in its diamond mines so isn't it interior the united statesstrategic pastime to help it in a roundabout way with foreign places help. we could no longer additionally ignore interior the case of Africa that maximum Africans on no account see a penny of the money we deliver, additionally the African gadget only would not see human rights the comparable way as we do. I keep in mind as a toddler 35 years in the past giving my 5p to the missions a week besides because of the fact the different 750 infants in my college accelerated by utilising each college in eire, incorporate the united kingdom in that, upload Europe upload workers donations upload charity sequence drives then upload government donations and each little thing else. That could run into Billions of help each twelve months, extremely each village could have a nicely, each city could have a scientific institution and drugs, a functioning community and national government a sophisticated verbal substitute gadget and a surplus of food? nicely, Why no longer?? the place have all those trillions long gone?Why is Africa nevertheless the comparable? ,Africa could be a Paradise by utilising now.. it extremely is why I on no account supply to Charity's that do paintings out of the united kingdom and consequently international help could be stopped thoroughly as a fashion to stress Africans to handle there human beings precise and instill regime substitute. beneficial hundreds of thousands might die yet it extremely is the value to pay.

Answer 6

It is true that not all aid gets through to the people it was aimed at and that is the fault of corrupt governments ruling the affected countries.

But some does get through, and even if only a percentage does, then it's better to help some people than leaving all the people at the mercy of corrupt dictators.

We should all try to help those less fortunate if and when we can.

Answer 7

i absolutely agree... 3rd world govts. expect to have their begging bowls filled with no questions asked. they get billions, which they mostly put into their personal bank accounts.
if there was no aid, the situation would be forced to sort itself out, and once done, they are more likely pull them selves up by the socks and work to make their country a place worth living in.

unfortunately man is greedy, so as long as there is a market to exploit, the fortunate countries will take advantage of poor countries.

Answer 8

in some cases only, but the other aid is likely true but need to pay it later on there no such free in this world like the aid of U S A but in the the spirit of friendship will and okey.

Answer 9

I don;t know what country you have in mind. But living here in south Florida makes me wonder if the people who left when Castro took over will go back and make things right .Plus I wonder if the people of Haiti would do better if they learned how to farm their land instead of destroy it.

Answer 10

it helps somewhat but to much makes people rely on it instead of letting it help them get started on track to a better life