I need you opinion?Gay people may cause bad influence to cloning?They may force forward cloning process?they migth ask to have their own babies and that will destroy socity norms?
2006-11-19 08:08:31 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
elena, all your questions are mad rants about gay people. if you are not gay, then why are you obsessed with gay people? maybe you should do something else with your time than rave about gay people. are they bothering you? are they making your life difficult? i think you've got a lot to learn.
2006-11-19 08:15:13 · answer #1 · answered by niko 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Wow. Thats seriously paranoid! If gay people wanted a baby of their own, then surely breeding in the normal human manner (or via artificial insemination) would be a lot easier than cloning - besides anything else, you seem to be imagining a secret gay pact to influence governments and take over the world; if thats what you're after, try the religious right wing the world over or the extreme left wing - they're way more dangerous than some insidious gay revolution.
Besides anything else, what would be so wrong with gay families? if two people can love a child and bring them up to respect and care for others, then how could that possibly harm society? There is room for a lot more love in this world and it seems that there are many straight couples who do not have the capacity to give it properly; are they not damaging society by bringing up children who can't interact properly, or dont care for anything but themselves?
2006-11-19 08:32:49 · answer #2 · answered by jj 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah yes, I can see that. Many people (not me) could disagree with cloning because it could be a way for gay people (seen by many as unnatural and irreligious) to have their own children. They could be seen to be raising kids in an environment that is 'wrong' and that will taint the child. I have nothing against gay people having kids. Though not too sure on cloning, because we don't know the results yet. And Dolly the sheep died early :(
x
2006-11-19 08:19:37 · answer #3 · answered by lady_s_hazy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who is to say that turning people gay is not natures way of restricting population growth on an overcrowded planet!
Cloning should have no place in society as a whole regardless of race, gender, religion or anything else. The planet is too crowded already.
Leave gays in peace to do what they will.
2006-11-19 08:12:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Stop your belly aching cloning is the next step for our human evolution it will cure diseases allow clones to fight our wars and give everyone a slave.Sounds pretty good to me and if the gays want cloned babies I couldnt care less what that does for your view of humanity
2006-11-19 08:18:51 · answer #5 · answered by royalpalaceofhell 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you may desire to understand that nature constantly produces a small proportion of gays from what you will possibly desire to call the hassle-free gene pool of our standard species. The mechanism in contact seems to be the only that permits each and every team of society, super or small, to have a pecking or dominance order between its contributors. Gays are oftentimes those on the backside of that order as they do no longer seem to be predicted to reproduce and don't prefer the traits that could in maximum circumstances make one aggressive in that section. briefly the norm isn't the Rock Hudson or Anne Heche form of man or woman, greater heavily resembles the Harvey Feirstein or Janet Reno sort. there is rumored to be a flow between some gay analyze varieties to make the reproductive technique greater equivalent and predictable, and to strengthen the point of what they might have be a sub-species subsequently, via a selective cloning application. yet maximum have faith that's doomed to failure as social variations will enable the latent bi-sexuality of maximum individuals of the inhabitants to grow to be dominant, and the strain for selective cloning would be countered with the resulltant isolation of the completely homosexuals, who would be seen as lacking finished sexual variety, extremely than the only practitioners of the so observed as "dick" oriented arts. .
2016-10-04 03:38:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a phenomenal overestimate of the influence of the gay community on our society.
2006-11-19 08:11:05 · answer #7 · answered by FSJD 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My head is spinning on this one.
Gay clones?
2006-11-19 08:10:54 · answer #8 · answered by <><><> 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gay people are out to get us!?
I am so always the last one to get the memo.
;)
2006-11-19 08:11:16 · answer #9 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Listen I am not gay but your question is completely ridiculous.
What the heck are you talking about?
2006-11-19 08:12:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋