need you opinion?Gay people may cause bad influence to cloning?

Question

I need you opinion?Gay people may cause bad influence to cloning?They may force forward cloning process?they migth ask to have their own babies and that will destroy socity norms?

Answer 1

No.
Actually "we" have the exact same options that anyone else has when dealing with not being fertile with our "partner" and have no more influence toward cloning of the sort that you suggest than other groups.
So far surrogacy, artificial insemination, and adoption seems to work pretty well. I don't see that changing.
Cloning a human being in the method you suggest still hasn't happened and as far as I know is still years away.

All I can "see" from your question is just another sad attempt at finding another reason to disparage gays.

Answer 2

You need to understand that nature consistently produces a small percentage of gays from what you might call the common gene pool of our overall species. The mechanism involved appears to be the one that allows each group of society, large or small, to have a pecking or dominance order among its members. Gays are usually those at the bottom of that order as they are not expected to reproduce and don't need the qualities that would ordinarily make one competitive in that arena. In short the norm is not the Rock Hudson or Anne Heche type of individual, more closely resembles the Harvey Feirstein or Janet Reno model.
There is rumored to be a movement among some gay research types to make the reproductive process more equal and predictable, and to raise the level of what they would have be a sub-species accordingly, through a selective cloning program.
But most believe this is doomed to failure as social changes will allow the latent bi-sexuality of the majority of the population to become dominant, and the pressure for selective cloning will be countered with the resulltant isolation of the exclusively homosexuals, who will be seen as lacking full sexual range, rather than the only practitioners of the so called "dick" oriented arts.

.

Answer 3

Wow. Thats heavily paranoid! If gay human beings needed a toddler of their very own, then incredibly breeding contained in the traditional human way (or via man made insemination) could be plenty less difficult than cloning - as nicely the rest, you seem imagining a secret gay p.c.. to impression governments and take over the worldwide; if thats what you're after, attempt the non secular precise wing the worldwide over or the severe left wing - they're much greater risky than some insidious gay revolution. as nicely the rest, what could be so incorrect with gay families? if 2 human beings can love a baby and placed across them as much as recognize and preserve others, then how might desire to that probable harm society? there is room for as a result plenty greater love in this worldwide and it sort of feels that there are a number of rapidly couples who don't be ready to supply it exact; are they no longer destructive society by citing toddlers who won't be able to work together exact, or dont preserve something yet themselves?

Answer 4

I would suppose that you believe that people are born gay. There are cases in which that may be the case, however, for the most part it is a choice and a lifestyle. As far as cloning goes, only people who don't believe in God want to play God. If he wants someone on this planet, he is more than capable of putting them here himself. Aside from that, you would have get into the vast details of the actual procedure to find out exactly what is involved as far as genes, dna, etc. People also gain their individualism from their own personal experiences. How they are raised, taught, etc. Their is much more to creating a person than DNA.

Answer 5

A) You need to get a life
B) This is no place for a bigot like you
C) By making such remarks, you show your lack of intelligence
D) Small minded angry pathetic little people like you really need to grow up and get some serious help.
E) FYI, there is no proof what so ever that a homosexual person is a bad influence on anyone.

Answer 6

A. Please learn to type or at least spell (clearly no graduate student)

B. Your supposition is flawed on many levels (I'll translate for you, you no smart and no thinky right okie dokie?)

C. Cloning is not required since genetics is genetics (Again I'll translate, that mean luck of draw, you savvy now?)

D. oh hell, why bother, your just another moron who is uneducated, morally dyslexic, and probably screwing your sister.

Answer 7

I don't want to father a carbon copy of myself any more than anybody else would. Think about it for a minute, and you'll see how silly this question really is.

Answer 8

Alrighty then

Answer 9

omg, go away!