I don't know how reliable that test is, but I know that you can go to www.iqtest.com and all you have to do is give them your email address and they will send you your score. There's no other email from them besides that and a pretty reliable source.
2006-11-19 08:05:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
A ratio IQ of 204 could be what the test was implying. If you are under 16, (we'll use 6 years old in this instance) and you have a mental age of 12.24 or a ratio IQ of 204. Im assuming that sparknotes probably is unreliable seeing as few online tests are credible. If you desire a credible test online, the closest thing to one would be the national high IQ societies test. It is based not on a 16 year olds score but an 18 year olds because it is an average of 16 scores an 20's. Mulitplying the IQ you recieve on this test, times 18, devided by you age, times 100 should give you an accurate range of your IQ. Do not trust the test wholeheartedly, but use it as a general idecator of where you stand. For imformation on relating deviation IQ with ratio IQ, visiting www.geocities.com/ultrahiiq/Deviation_IQs.html would give you a semi accurate view of how you will be as an adult.
In relation to myself, I have a at my current age of 13, a ratio IQ of over 200, which then correlate with my professional adult IQ test score of 178. I hope this will create an accurate spectrum of your IQ in relation. Another tid bit is that you percentile if 204 is your deviation IQ, would be 99.9999999908%, but I assume this is not the case. I hope this can better your understanding of the intelligance quotient.
2006-11-22 06:37:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Professor Sheed 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you scored 204 it is unreliable.
There are currently no tests qualified to test beyond an IQ of 166, SD 15 with accuracy (about 171 on the commonly used SD 16 scale).
All high range tests used to score above this are generally not extremely reliable, and their validity is questionable.
Childhood IQ scores of kids 6-10 can exceed 166; however, the score needs to be met with objectivity; we don't even know what scores over 140 in general really mean, let alone 166.
2006-11-19 12:03:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
those i've got taken have been surely a try of intelligence. with the flexibility to become attentive to varieties in pictures and are available up with the subsequent logical answer, word institutions, become attentive to varieties interior a sequence of numbers,math issues, and so on...i could choose for to think of they are precise (I did o.k. each and every time i substitute into examined) even if as Pope pronounced your approach on the time performs a great factor, being nicely rested in the past taking the try made a difference of 18 pts between my worse and ultimate score.
2016-11-25 20:00:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by mill 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think they are all wronge cause i got 133 and im only in 7th grade..or is that average?
2006-11-19 15:53:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its not at all reliable.
2006-11-19 08:27:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by George K 6
·
2⤊
1⤋