English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What are the chances of society abandoning technology returning to a nineteenth-century way of life?

2006-11-19 06:50:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

10 answers

Slim to none, unless some major disaster happened on Earth and people were forced to do it because of destruction of the infrastructure.

2006-11-19 06:53:18 · answer #1 · answered by Marti M 3 · 2 0

In the most part it will not happen. Once you give a child a piece of candy you can never take that memory or experience away from that child. In other words to many people rely on technology.
We were talking here at the house about the big business are starting to use messenger services again to hand deliver sensitive material to others around there town. They are stopping the email etc. for the security is better....this was in the news a little while back.

2006-11-19 06:55:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Good question... I think we are digging a hole with all the advanced products we "need" so despratly to survive in our ever-so automatic state of distraction. We all witnessed a neglect on a scale previously unimaginable when the levies broke, just another sign of the times witnessed in the reclined position as the McGobbler Meal drips down my blue collar peice of scrap left behind by the cat. At one time, the middle class was as they are now. However, this all changed with the quickly rising rents and gasoline's dents to a sence stifled populus debt strickened and depressed because of the flattest ever tv. sets and celular rings that sound so clean I dream about the thing. I think its time to through out the clutter. Thats right, pile up all unwanted extremities and give them to the 3rd world contries in exchange for horse's with there intracitly woven blankets, and saddles ,laced in the fallen hides of those few whos last stride was untrue. i'll forget the ac and swett bullets with the rest of the whiskered gullets and bet on a structured backstep to set rewind on a chaotic capitalistic design set up-on the dollars almighty shine. Find yourself surrounded by a nature rich in life, and soon after the moon sets intoon with the tide, the side chosen will groom all souls and unfold her womb to those once sold and bought for that presidential dead. credit cards with mislead words serving the bread under a sky crimson coated and polluted.

2006-11-19 08:13:33 · answer #3 · answered by fluent_c_libra 2 · 0 0

It is inconceivable at this time.
A world wide destruction of outrageous proportions especially in the metropolitan areas where mass production is centered and industry came to a cessation. No manufacturing, no farming no agribusiness. Even today in the religious communities who practice 18-19th century life still buy cloth from today's industry.
Not that they could not do on their own. but the quantity it is needed in. Gandhi did it somewhat in India but as a boycott, not necessity.
If a cataclysm of epic size were to befall us, I believe we would have to return to the Neanderthal period and few would adjust.
Only the strong will survive. So save your Boy Scouts training books and any survival manuals along with first aid books and supplies. Do you still have your 2K rescue packs? Do you know where you can get fresh water?

2006-11-19 08:04:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No we isn't extinct. The planet continues to be liveable in many components with none technologies extra complicated than a stick, and there are too many folk that some won't stay to tell the story diverse failures (inventory industry crash, international warming, sea point upward thrust, H1N1, tornadoes and so on.) An optimist could say that we are going to return to our senses, abandon unsustainable practices inclusive of exponential inhabitants and economic improve - nevertheless seen as suitable by utilising our fool leaders - and use our technologies to make a extra suitable existence for each individual. that could incorporate 2 young ones in step with couple, cyber web and bicycles for each individual, music, arts, study, old stuff recycled into new extra suitable stuff and so on. A pessimist could say that we are going to depart it too previous due. Pressures on our environment (unbreathable air, crop failure, costly gasoline) will carry approximately an economic fall down which will make it impossible to invest in any technologies which will save us. So there will be a partial extinction experience when you consider that we won't be able to feed the present inhabitants without specific point of technologies (autos, tractors, ships) to advance and distribute food. when you consider that our tecnological economic gadget is so interconnected, without specific inhabitants point we can be no longer able to make new products - case in point, modern-day autos require digital ignitions require electronics and semiconductors and capacitors created from supplies from all international extensive. In some eventualities, neo-luddites intentionally abandon technologies. In others, we only be afflicted by a skills die-off and the lack to swap equipment that finally wears out. In others, we've handed the singularity and might need faith in nanomachines and self-repairing robots to make new stuff out of junk. staring on the Earth with the aid of a telescope, it extremely is form of obtrusive that it extremely is finite and that a 2% annual improve of something will crush it extremely is ability faster or later. We lack the capacity to boost into the image voltaic gadget in significant numbers quickly adequate, and that's finite too. We actual lack the skill to boost into the galaxy.

2016-11-25 19:54:52 · answer #5 · answered by barreda 4 · 0 0

Nearly zero.
It would take a major technology crash of unimaginable proportions to cause us to revert to a nineteenth century way of life.

2006-11-19 06:52:48 · answer #6 · answered by rita_alabama 6 · 3 0

You would even try to take a man's cell phone? His new car?
His GPS tracking device, that keeps his wife from givning directions? That is inhuman.

2006-11-19 06:53:37 · answer #7 · answered by Steven 6 · 1 2

0%

2006-11-19 06:53:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Very very remote

2006-11-19 06:53:38 · answer #9 · answered by Bisi K 1 · 1 1

None whatsoever. Do you think we should?

2006-11-19 06:52:52 · answer #10 · answered by clueless_nerd 5 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers