2006-11-19 05:46:56 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Teaching
KILL KILL KILL
2006-11-19 05:49:04 · answer #1 · answered by Droptine s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's rather vague. just what do you mean? if you're talking about cancer, i've got hours and hours of conversation for you on that subject...just read my profile. obviously it's better to cure than to kill, but that's a generality, as is your question.
2006-11-19 13:49:29 · answer #2 · answered by vrandolph62 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's only better to kill if the person is in a lot of pain and won't fully recover.
2006-11-19 13:55:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a strange question for the "teaching" category. My first thought, however, are the words of the Hippocratic Oath: I swear ... to never do harm to anyone. That works for doctors, and I think it's good advice for everyone.
2006-11-19 14:19:11 · answer #4 · answered by dmb 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, it is better to cure. Have you ever had warts? I would rather be cured than killed.
2006-11-19 13:48:55 · answer #5 · answered by ewanspewan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before answering this question, I'd like to know the context.
2006-11-19 13:49:19 · answer #6 · answered by Jon M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in some instances yes it is....
people have sick dogs put down, if a person has no quality of life etc who are we to condemn them to more pain?
2006-11-19 13:49:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. what kind of question is that?
2006-11-19 13:48:01 · answer #8 · answered by American school girl 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what? germs?
2006-11-19 13:48:13 · answer #9 · answered by rachel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋