Is material world real?

Answer 1

Material world is illusion. If we get deeper into the material elements, we will find atoms. If we inquire the atoms we will find other smaller particles such as electrons and protons and neutrons. And among these particles there is nothing. The distance between these particles is millions times the diameters of these particles. And now the scientist have found out that all theses atomic particles are nothing but energy, a kind of waves.
So what we are sensing with our so called sensory organs (brain smell etc) is nothing but the impression of something not real touching something not real.
If we calculate the substantial part of the material we will find only nothing exists but emptiness.
So the sensation we feel is only struggles of different energies; and we call that reality.

Answer 2

If "nothing is real" you are making no sense.
Our options here are not many. Something must be real.
Is it idealism? -- you are completely trapped in skepticism about anything external to your own perceptions, if that's the case.

Is it matter that engages with our sense organs to generate our perceptions? If you think there's substance 'out there' that is the ground for all reality, and we only ever perceive illusory appearances, then you're still trapped in your own head. The outside world can never be known, and your ideas of it are just ripples in the pond from true being.

So, I hope all this motivates the point that empirical realism is still the best characterization of reality as such. How we cognize the objects out there -- the tables and chairs-- that stuff is totally real. We get it right about these things with amazing precision aided by our empirical sciences. But if you look at the same object abstracted from the human faculties, it is beyond comprehension and impossible to know. Hence transcendental idealism is that aspect of the world that is rubbish to think about, it goes beyond our very ability to think about it, and is a mere idea of a thing in the end.

Again, if you make the ground for reality transcendental realism, you can never attain reality and everything gained by the senses is 'just an idea' about what reality is really like -- an extra-human, view from nowhere.

Answer 3

Yes the material world is real and to quote the Buddhist concept of emptiness can be misleading with respect to the true essences.

What is not real is the way you perceive it. That is progressively it may be more or less than you currently comprehend and that is part of why it is said to be empty,like you always changing always becoming!

Answer 4

you haven't any longer long previous off the deep end. there's a college of metaphysics customary as anti-realism, which argues that finally "no element" exists. that's supported by the recommendations of quantum physics that there is not any maximum suitable partical, no elementary piece of count number, yet basically capability fields that signify what we grow to be attentive to as count number, contained in the form of atoms and molicules. quicker or later, as that's debatable, those collections of tension fields handle actual properties, which we grow to be attentive to with the aid of fact the actual universe. The anti-realist will argue that the table on which i'm typing is extremely uncounted trillions of tiny tension fields separated by empty area, and this decision of tension fields is a table basically to the quantity that individuals conceptualize it to be a "table," that's only a acceptance we supply to varieties (or tokens) that have this shape or serve this function. In quantum physics, the place a quantum is the two a wave and a particle, the remark of the quanta collapses the wave type and makes the observer actually the author of count number. something like that's additionally an hassle-free concept between the extremely some colleges of Buddhaism, the place "issues" are only our conceptions of an ever-changing fact. that's truthfully an exciting place in the adventure that your hassle-free ontology is substance based or, to apply a diverse term materialist. even with the undeniable fact that, in the adventure that your hassle-free ontology is relational, the lack of an maximum suitable particle is irrelevant. If the worldwide relies on the relationship of the two tension fields or bits of count number, and if those relationships are extremely stable and recommendations self sufficient, than realism is an appropriate metaphysical place, even with quantum physics. It additionally relies upon on no count number in case you agree for Aristotelian good judgment, which focuses on the problem, or a sort of great judgment developed by a jap logician, which focuses on the predicate. those are 2 diverse gestalts, and that i do no longer recognize of any purpose criterion by which you would be able to ensure that one is stable and the different incorrect. Grace be unto you and peace.

Answer 5

Not only is it real, but I think I can give you a proof of it (this is originally from G.E. Moore).

If there are at least two objects which I can manipulate, then there is an external world.
(Hold up one hand and shake it a bit) Here is one hand
(Now hold up the other and do the same) Here is the other
//Therefore, there is an external world

Answer 6

check out a documentary called -the elegant universe -in three parts .you can find it on BBC in the browsers
and you will find out just how real or unreal, the material world is

Thoth said 36.000 years ago-infinate love is the only truth ,everything else is an illusion.

Answer 7

material world is always real as it contains matter.

Answer 8

Real enough for me. Life is too short to spend it over thinking the many thousands possibilities.

Answer 9

Material world is not real, it is an illusion. The time you recognize it's worthlessness, you knows that how fake it was.

Answer 10

From a spiritual basis the answer is no. But from the idea, or notion (to put it in a more accurate perspective) that we are to gather truth from what is or seems to be present right now, the answer is yes.