2006-11-19 04:06:58 · 6 answers · asked by paulisfree2004 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
LET THEM SORT IT OUT..
AMERICA HAD A CIVIL WAR..
MANY COUNTRIES HAVE...
THEIR RELIGION-THEIR PEOPLE-LET THEM SETTLE ALLAH AND SUCH.
2006-11-19 04:29:42 · answer #1 · answered by cork 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't call it a civil war... I would call it extremist groups from other countries trying to gain power.
We need to get Iraq under control and independent. If we pull out, Iran will step in and take over. If we lose Iraq, we will lose any chance for middle east peace.
2006-11-19 12:13:49 · answer #2 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Correct me if I'm wrong. Fewer people died, by far, under Saddam's rule, than the Bush Regime? Iraq was less dangerous. Fewer terrorists. Of course, I guess Halliburton knows best.
2006-11-19 12:18:15 · answer #3 · answered by flip4449 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's not a civil war the way I see it. It's just one front of them many on the war on terror. If we can't get a grasp on that than we are in trouble. We can't become isolists for the sake of ignorance and desire to live in denial.
2006-11-19 12:12:43 · answer #4 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We should put a new Saddam in place until things calm down.
2006-11-19 12:16:43 · answer #5 · answered by Gary 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush didn't go there for the Iraqi people, he went there for the black gold.
2006-11-19 12:08:57 · answer #6 · answered by Sean 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋