It depends whether we as a country is ready to wake up and see the light....
You can preside over the most catastrophic failure of intelligence and national defense in history. Can fire no one associated with this fatal chain of blunders and bureaucratic buck-passing. Can oppose an inquest into September 11 for more than a year until pressure from the relatives of those killed on that day becomes politically toxic. Can name Henry Kissinger, that mortician of truth, to head the independent commission you finally accede to. You can start an unnecessary war that kills thousands of Americans and as many more Iraqi civilians—adjusted for the difference in population, the equivalent of 80,000 Americans. Can occupy Iraq without a plan to restore traffic lights, much less order. Can make American soldiers targets in a war of attrition conducted by snipers, assassins, and planters of remote-control bombs—and taunt the murderers of our young men to "bring it on." Can spend hundreds of billions of dollars on nation building—and pass the bill to America's children. (Asked to consider rescinding your tax cut for the top one percent of taxpayers for one year in order to fund the $87 billion you requested from Congress to pay for the occupation of Iraq, your Vice President said no; that would slow growth.) You can lose more jobs than any other President since Hoover. You can cut cops and after-school programs and Pell Grants and housing allowances for the poor to give tax cuts to millionaires. You can wreck the nation's finances, running up the largest deficit in history. You can permit 17,000 power plants to increase their health-endangering pollution of the air. You can lower the prestige of the United States in every country of the world by your unilateral conduct of foreign policy and puerile "you're either with us or against us" rhetoric. Above all, you can lie the country into war and your lies can be exposed—and, if a majority prefers ignorance to civic responsibility you can still continue to rule in ignorant bliss.....
2006-11-19 08:42:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, just a little pause, when the media control laws go back to the way they were, then there might be a chance, it is not, when push comes to shove, the majority of the media will report untruths or blow up and repeat something over and over and over again on whomever goes against the power behind Bush, Reagan first changed the laws with something called the fair media act, which wasn't fair, it used to be by law, both sides had to have equal time, not since the end of Reagan's term, then Bush Jr, signed another media law unrestricting the equal amount of media ownership in one market, so not one side can own all media in the market, The major media was controlled by about 40 different sources before the first change, now is owned by 5, look at what the owners of each would gain by who is in office. I know some say oh the liberal media, but look how the term liberal is used in a negative was all over, the same liberal media who made headlines every day for 6 years if Clinton had sex, think about it..... Used to be the far right and the far left had equal time, and they would pretty much balance each other out and what was best for most Americans would happen, now we are in the world of record profits from sending jobs overseas while Americans are out of work, record bankruptcies, record foreclosures, record nation debt, record amount of jobs lost, record trade deficit. Ya this is sure reported by the (liberal media) every day
2006-11-19 04:20:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jon J 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I definitely have published 3 question in my entire time on yahoo solutions a million approximately my hair . and the different 2 approximately Bush. only asserting something that i've got confidence an the two one in all my questions have been bumped off not something that modify into remotely incorrect. yet some people are not into freedom of speech in case you do not have confidence what they suspect. i think of he's rubbish ! and that i think of he a diverse minded individual that would not elect the conflict to provide up. i've got confidence that he's what led to all the mess that we are in.
2016-10-22 08:56:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO
It's just getting started.
Look at all the dedicated Redsters drooling for another Bush.
They are like Israel. Moses told the Congregation of Israel before he died "The day will come when you will want a king. And will cry to the most high God and say give us a king oh God that we may be like the other Nations"
Go big Red Go
2006-11-19 04:10:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by 43 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Bush Dynasty has been going on for four generations. I don't think it's finished.
2006-11-19 04:09:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by flip4449 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Don't count on it.. Jeb is a smiley kind of fellow, he'll get his shot.
True story ...My sister in law dated Marvin Bush back in the day when they were both in college, and he said in the 70's .. my dad will be president. and he made no bones about the fact that that was they way it would be.. period,
self assured rich kid ? Or somebody in the know ?
either way these people were groomed for the facade.
2006-11-19 04:08:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by sitizen_x 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'd watch out for Rudy Gulliani. If he gets elected President, he's just going to pick up where Dubya left off. He's like part of the family.
2006-11-19 04:11:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by spackler 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Let's hope so. The thought of another Bush ascending to the Presidency (Jeb-Bob) is enough to make me toss my cookies.
2006-11-19 07:24:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I heard Noel Bush is running for Surgeon General so she can write her own prescriptions
2006-11-19 04:19:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Amanda S 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
No im pretty sure one of his daughters is setting herself up early for a career in politics.
Seriously though it doesnt matter, all politicians and Presidents are equally corrupt some just get away with it a little longer.
2006-11-19 04:05:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
5⤊
2⤋