Will the environment always be "someone else's problem" to deal with/fix?

Question

This is America's view on the environment. Always leave it to future generations and other people. Just keep passing that buck, baby!

Answer 1

Well thats Bush's view. Enviromentalists aren't allowed to relase any information that could suggest a bad future. The government goes over most policies and takes out any threatening information.

I support Gore and his decision to make it publicly known.

Answer 2

The environment isn't just someones "problem" it's everyones' responsibility. By thinking that the health of the environment is something that won't affect you is not true, and that someone else will fix it is a procrastinators mato. You don't have to go out and solve all the major problems, but you can do the small things. Pick up any litter you see. Volunteer to help clean up parks and wild life habitats. Driving less and walking more. You can do a great deal of help by just doing what is right and keep your corner of it clean, and encourage others to do the same thing. The more people you get to help, the better our world will be.

Answer 3

absolutely not. But rather than depend on the politicians to solve all the problems, I have started contributing my 2 cents worth. We recycle everything. We drive a fuel efficient car. We pay a bit extra to our electricity company to use only green energy. We vote green. If each individual took steps like this, it would help the world situation big-time.

Answer 4

Industrial Pollution is like a man that has to pea. You can only hold it so long and then all you can think about is a way to release it. When you finally find a place to go you don;t care where it is as long as no one sees you.

Go big Red Go

Answer 5

i'm no longer a Beatles fan, and that i do no longer locate no longer something offensive approximately that music or them traces in any respect. He substitute into only making a fact approximately himself, or perhaps even somebody else, that hit their woman be it a girl pal or spouse, which sorry to assert did happen extra many times back then than it does to day, I could say it occurred back then as much because it does to day, yet substitute into excepted as in, human beings did no longer communicate approximately it that plenty. And all Lennon did substitute into carry it to the vanguard, to enable human beings be attentive to what is going on interior the international, and no person is doing something approximately it. yet he or the guy of their music is doing something approximately it, as he's stopped beating the female and issues are becoming to be extra suitable. i do no longer see no longer something incorrect with that in the time of any respect. i think of possibly you're going overboard somewhat with the music. So i assume you do unlike Hendrix taking pictures his old woman and working off to Mexico. I guess she substitute into overwhelmed many circumstances, in the past she substitute into shot. Or the Rolling Stones, making a music approximately how stupid female, a positioned down on all women individuals, and that they have been ineffective. yet that may no longer the case. One continually has to keep in mind interior the 50s it substitute into o.k. accepted that adult adult males beat their woman, lady pal/spouse, and it additionally substitute into real into the 60s, while human beings like the Beatles further it to the vanguard. so as a music is going, it extremely is a great music, for it extremely is open to what substitute into occurring on the time, and that it is likewise time to alter issues and make it extra suitable. If i substitute into bothered by utilising that music for that verse on my own, then i could be bothered by utilising over have the songs in my sequence. i'm pleased with that. reason all it extremely is doing is telling me issues like that have been given to end, and we ought to start to make issues extra suitable. wherein case he's doing. take care dave

Answer 6

What [environment] problem(s)? I keep hearing the doom & gloom, but don't see any real evidence.
***
200 years ago, wasn't it always somebody else's problem to solve millions of everyday hardships -- that have been by technology brought to us by men with engaged brains & the new freedom (from the enlightenment) to use them?

Answer 7

As long as it is more profitable for corporate America to pollute this will be a problem. It is a massive problem that no one wants to under take. It is overwhelmingly a large problem, that will take years to fix, if ever.

Answer 8

no i don't think so because the way our world is going right now i think that we need to get off of our buts and go out there and help the inviroment and i know what you are thinking right now, that i am sitting on my but looking at a computer, well i am talking about me too.

Answer 9

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Answer 10

That is the way it has worked in the past, just keep passing it off!!!!!