Only for a few select people. I'd not want to help bring a child into the world unless I thought the kid would be raised right. That being said, I'd do it for my sister. I'm not sure I could do it for anyone else. Because even if its not my kid genetically (and I'd not want the kid to have my dna), I'd still feel a part of it. I'd trust my sister with my children, so I'd be able to trust her with a baby I helped with. Parenthood is a serious thing.
2006-11-19 04:27:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Velken 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some varieties of surrogacy. in a single the surrogate consists of the embryo from the couple, the mans sperm and lady’s egg. on occasion one or the two might desire to be donated. So say the female’s eggs aren’t working they use a donated egg or any opposite direction with the mans. If sperm or egg isn’t from the two couple then its needed adopting any embryo. the two difficulty the surrogate isn't the organic and organic mom. yet another is the place the surrogate donates her egg, and is man made inseminated with the lads sperm, subsequently the toddler is organic and organic hers. I workers does not be somebody surrogate no longer with each and every of the youngsters that prefer loving properties that are already in our worldwide. It probably could be worthwhile even with the undeniable fact that it may additionally be stressful. The surrogate will bond to the toddler regardless if its organic and organic hers or no longer. there have been surrogates who've desperate to maintain the toddler, observing the state some have rights whether they aren’t organic and organic the mum. they're the birthmother in maximum states the birthmother is seen the legal mom, even with DNA.
2016-10-04 03:27:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's a very selfless thing to do. I know that most states require you to have had children prior to being a surrogate. I assume this is so that they are sure you are satisfied with your family and don't want to keep the baby.
I don't know that I could be a surrogate only because I found being pregnant very uncomfortable and I always had horrible morning sickness. I was so sick I was pretty much in bed for 5 months and I couldn't take that time away from my own family again.
2006-11-19 03:55:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Melissa J 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It really did depend on what part of my life I was in. I don't think I'd ever do it before I had kids of my own.
I also would not do it if the children were to receive half my DNA - in other words, I wouldn't do it if it required for artificial insemination, but I might do it if I they were fertilized eggs that were to be implanted and their DNA was from either their mother and father, or from an egg donor who was not me.
I would never be able to give a child that shares half of my DNA to someone else.
2006-11-19 03:59:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by antheia 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
No way I can do it personally. I love babies so much that to go through pregnancy (which is not easy to put it mildly) and receive nothing more than a 'warm fuzzy' is not worth it to me.
I do not condemn those who can do this, I think it's very noble.
However I can't have sex absent of love either- it's one in the same for me. I do not condemn those who can have sex without love though; I think it saves alot of feelings.
2006-11-19 04:00:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
i have thought about it but i think after carrying the baby for nine month i could never give it up i would end up keeping it and there would be a huge problem so i could never
2006-11-19 04:03:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by momma 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes, i could be although you need to realize how tramatic this is, you bond with this child then its gone, be sure you go to counseling to start dealing with this before you have post tramatic feelings.
2006-11-19 04:01:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I thought about it (but it would have to be a fertilized egg implantation).. I love being pregnant and they money is really good.
2006-11-19 03:54:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by iampatsajak 7
·
2⤊
2⤋