I hear you. I think that it's too much time in front of the TV and not enough time working and serving real people. Combine that with a general distrust of their own culture and traditions and a generally elementary level of logic which "substitute(s) your reality, and replace(s) it with [their] own" (quoted from Adam on Mythbusters), and we've created the typical liberal, a virtual Frankenstein from the removal of spirituality from science.
2006-11-19 03:52:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Andy 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
What is the deal with liberal? Hmmm, let's see;Maybe it is because I am so in love with liberty and personal freedoms. Maybe it is because I still am in awe and have the greatest respect for the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights.
Maybe the deal is that long ago, I read the ruminations and politcophilosophical works of the founding fathers of this republic, and discovered that , when they wrote the Constitution, they intended it to be an umbrella of protection for the rights of Americans,stretching out to encompass as many of our freedoms and liberties as it could protect and gaurantee. They did not believe that the Constitution was an encyclopedia that listed the rights and freedoms specifically, and if it was not literally spelled out in the document, then that right, or those freedoms did not get protection. That is that moron Scalia who says that> Scalia says that the right to choose for, or against having an abortion is in no way protected by the Constitution because the word abortion and the word, Pro-Choice does not appear in the constitution. If that is the way the constitution is supposed to be interpreted (hereinafter referred to as the "Strict-Constructionist View" say,,, did'nt we try that way once already, and it did not work out) then there would still be Men's Rooms, Ladies' Rooms, and separate bathrooms for "Coloureds".We would still have black and white education systems, separate but equal (rotflmao).And above all King George I D.G. Rex would not be president. The constitution says nothing about integration, the word segregation does not appear in the constitution (though it does specifical mention slaves and slavery).School systems would be the strict affairs of each and everyone of the separate states, because the constitution did not specify that the Federal Govt should have power over education. And , of course, no place in the Constitution of the United States does it say that the Supreme Court should have any role in the election of the president. And if GeorgeyTwit had not been allowed to seize the office of presidency by aborting the first election, with the help of the Supremes, then he would not have had the incumbent's edge of 2-3% points that carried him in the second.And what a beautiful world that would have been
2006-11-19 11:47:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by lickherisquicker 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
2 for 1 discount until december - thats the deal
2006-11-19 11:37:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
What do you mean? What's the deal with them wanting to raise taxes? What's the deal with them wanting to destroy the economy? What's the deal with their morals? What's the deal with taxing the people that work for their money and giving it to the lazy and uneducated? Is that what you mean?
2006-11-19 11:33:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Abu 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
They are a typical minority that thinks they have a right to exist.
Like those black muslim people in Darfur. They feel they have a right to be alive. But Arab muslims disagree they want to kill all non Arab (indoeuropian) muslim believers.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-19 11:35:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by 43 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Morality, compassion and intelligence.
Thats the deal with liberals.
2006-11-19 11:35:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
The deal... I'm going to need some specifics.
2006-11-19 11:32:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
What's your deal?
2006-11-19 11:35:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by flip4449 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Its the effect of ted kennedys contribution to the global warming and its effected their mental capabilities.One can only handle so many of teds farts on the senate floor before it was some sort of residual effect.
2006-11-19 11:36:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by halfbright 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
It's a mental disorder. You should whisper when you're around them. lest they be startled into coming up with a new government program or a tax increase..
2006-11-19 11:33:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Stretchy McSlapNuts 3
·
2⤊
3⤋