italy -
good - so many . great defence , great goalie , great gameplan , great coach , attacking gameplay , good defence , italy can still win if their major player (s) are missing.
bad- too less . sometimes their forward line seems a buit week . they give the other teams chances to dominate over them . sometimes they get pressurized .
good - balanced and nice team , good and young players . nice attacking forward line , have very talented players who have a great futuire ahead .
bad - defence is a major - point for them , just in the game against greece , sometimes they were not agressive , they gave chances to the other team very easiy.
thanks .
2006-11-19 16:29:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tourist 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Italy:
Good Qualities: Everything
Bad Qualities: Nothing
France:
Good Qualities: Nothing
Bad Qualities: Everything, they have a gay goalkeeper & Zidane
2006-11-19 11:15:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by мяs. мαтεяαzzι 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Italy was a good team, but I didn't watch them enough to figure out what their weak points were.
The French team was very in shape and conditioned, but my problem with them was that almost everyone on the team was from French colonies, not France itself. The French practically cheated by bringing a whole bunch of soccer players from NOT France. If the French team played, saay, the Algerian team, no one would be able to tell who was who except by looking at their jerseys. That pissed me off more than anything else.
2006-11-19 02:22:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Amy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Italy
Good Q~They play like a team, and very good techniques
Bad Q~hmmm their sometime abit slow,need some speed
France
Good Q~Good speed and good Defence
Bad Q~They get to much hyper and loose it at the end!
2006-11-19 06:17:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pinky 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Italy's attack is not that strong.. The victory in Germany was unfair and it was a luck (yes sports is based on luck.. but the strength of team is not).. at the end of the final game the french had a beautiful game.. I was sure that France would score, but the crude game of Materazzi destroyed their victory..The weekness of the victory over the french was proved in 2-0 loss...
What about the french team.. I'm sure that without Henry, Zidane etc french team is nothing..
2006-11-19 03:14:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Engrossing 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Italy
Good-- Defend strong
Bad-- offence weak. Play more on defence. Very boring.
France
Good--Offence quite strong.
Bad-- No more Zidane. Don have a strong play maker.
2006-11-19 02:15:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by zldan3 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
FRANCE:players have the ability , Tactics arent the problem..The problem is (which clearly appeard in the final) they dont play with passion ..effort.. No confidence at all..and put 100 lines under the word self-confidence..They play very good football..they just need to have confidence in what they play for
ITALIA:good qualities is that they have the best gifted defenders in the world...there line-up is very well known therefore coach will concentrate more in improving their skills and qualities rather than thinking more on putting tactics..On the otherhand the negative qualities is the lack of attack..The line-up of the italian team is based mainly on defense.they hardly find talented attackers so it is always defenders who are attacking which isnot logical
2006-11-19 06:22:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Brazil
2016-03-19 11:08:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
italy;
good- goodlooking players, good defense, strong sportsmanship :)
bad- not really anything :) SOMETIMES theyre weak on offense, but not always. :)
france;
good- nice offense sometimes, good midfield
bad- not that many goodlooking players, but there are some. :) no more zidane. :( and offense is sometimes weak.
2006-11-19 05:20:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by doober 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Italy
Good:
Strong defense, great GK !!!
Bad
Boring, no strikers, annoying GK, gay looking players, ....
France
Good:
Fast players, strong attack and midfield, .....
Bad:
?
2006-11-19 04:52:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋