it doesn't make sense if all... is this just supposed to be a glaring continuity error we're supposed to ignore?
2006-11-19 02:04:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
thought it was supposed 2 be prequel but getting confused cos he looks really old 2 be a young naive agent .... honest not sour grapes i'm sure he's a god but he does not look young!
2006-11-19 02:39:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah i think its poetic licence they known its not in keeping with the line up but want judy dench to be in the movie I did think it was totally brilliant all the same. I more had a problem with the fact that if james bond was meant to be young and just getting his 00s how come he looked so old?!!
2006-11-19 11:32:12 · answer #2 · answered by honey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Judy Dench was the original M. So going back a bit in the sequence should put her there. First there was M, then there was Bond.
2006-11-19 10:13:27 · answer #3 · answered by sonyack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was under the assumption that Casino Royale wasn't a prequel to any of the other James Bond films. It was a reboot to the franchise much like Batman Begins. This one is meant to stand on its own and be the beginning of the new series of Bond films.
2006-11-19 11:14:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're right- and Bernard Lee was the original M... Similiar in the remake of Red Dragon, Hannibal Lecter's first story, Anthony Hopkins is older than he is in Hannibal!!
2006-11-19 10:43:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bernard Lee is probably dead who played M. I think you hit the nail on the head here. In the first book "Casino Royale", it was M who was a man.
2006-11-19 10:44:35 · answer #6 · answered by cadaholic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think we are supposed to forget the other bond films happened the same way they did with the "sum of all fears" film with jack ryan.
2006-11-19 10:09:42 · answer #7 · answered by andyprefab 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With you on this.
Could she be another Doctor?
Who?
2006-11-19 10:21:25 · answer #8 · answered by lulu 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it's a remake
2006-11-19 10:06:39 · answer #9 · answered by soxfan 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋