2006-11-19 01:03:04 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
and with healty.
2006-11-19 01:06:00 · update #1
I'd definitely go with 100 years healthy.Any reasonably intelligent person can make enough money to have a good life and save enough to have fun and enjoy life.Money does not = happiness.
2006-11-19 01:18:26 · answer #1 · answered by Vtmtnman 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That depends on the good I am able to do. While 100 years would be wonderful, I think with the money you could help change others lives in far greater ways than you can being poor.
2006-11-19 09:22:51 · answer #2 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
100 years healthy, definitely. Because it takes time to get to know things and learn and grow into yourself, and I reckon by fifty I'll still be making mistakes, and no amount of money will make up for them. By 100 I might just about have got the hang of things, and be able to make other people happy as well as myself.
2006-11-19 10:35:10 · answer #3 · answered by JBoy Wonder 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
100 years healthy
2006-11-19 10:02:49 · answer #4 · answered by brock 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
100 years healthy! I love life.
2006-11-19 09:06:20 · answer #5 · answered by vanhammer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer 100 years healthy, i will have more time to work and earn my money.
2006-11-19 09:05:51 · answer #6 · answered by kim914 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
100 years healthy definetely.
2006-11-19 09:04:30 · answer #7 · answered by Jer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
100 years healthy. Wealth is meaningless if you are unhealthy.
2006-11-19 09:24:47 · answer #8 · answered by Melissa 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
50 wealthy i would be happy to die at 71 i would never want to be 121yrs old even if i was healthy because everyone i know would of died long ago!!!!!!
2006-11-19 09:07:09 · answer #9 · answered by Kelz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
75, healthy and wealthy
2006-11-19 09:05:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋