This question is probably more for people who serve in the police force or perhaps those who are solicitors. I have read an article published today in the The Mail, of a teacher - Rebecca Poole who was subjected to sexual assault by one of her young male pupils. She was actually charged with engaging in sexual activity with the youngster but has been acquitted. For those who are familiar with the case; it has been stated on the article that no action will be brought against the teenager unless there is a formal complaint. But sexual assault is a criminal offence and it has been proved to have taken place in this court case, so surely the police have an obligation to take action and bring charges against the teenager on behalf of the Crown - even if Rebecca Poole or the school have not lodged a complaint? Please could someone clarify this.
2006-11-19 00:10:25 · 2 answers · asked by Jules R 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The teacher was on trial, accused of having sex with a minor, she was filmed on a mobile phone by the pupil giving oral sex, she claims he held a screwdriver to her head whilst this happened although I don't think the screwdriver was visible in the video. The trial didn't prove she was forced, just that the jury wasn't convinced beyond reasonable doubt that she was guilty. If you took the boy to court the jury would probably clear him for lack of proof also.
2006-11-19 00:31:33 · answer #1 · answered by Jack c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you're right. It shouldn't be up to the victim to press charges; that's the responsibility of the crown prosecution service.
i don't understand why she was prosecuted rather than the boy in the first place.
I don't understand why she didn't go to the police? Fear?
2006-11-19 00:28:47 · answer #2 · answered by leekier 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋