There are a couple of ways of looking at things.
You can look at the US and EU as the collection of conglomerates based in US/EU but including the plants overseas, and the subcontractors in th ethird world. Let's call that the extended model.
Or you can look at only the domestic economies, the production that takes place within the borders of the US and EU. Let's call that the Domestic model.
Extended Model:
The US does much more in terms of outsourcing, overseas production than the EU does. The Labour laws in the EU, and basically the power of Trade Unions in general hamper the conglomerates in the sense that they think twice before closing shop domestically and setting up shop or signing a contract with overseas subcontractors.
Secondly there is a question of culture. People in the US have absolutely no problems accepting that a CEO an get paid more than 200 times an average worker, whereas the gap is ten times less in the EU. The focus in the US is on profits, so outsourcing, 'downsizing'... are accepted, even cheered. In Europe, the focus is more on the people, this is reflected in the decisions of the top managements in terms of investments, plant closures...
These apply on top of the differences on the domestic front.
Domestic Model
The US is much more active in terms of undermining the WTO by signing short term FTA agreements with a variety of countries, getting these countries to open up their markets to US-branded goods with very low tariffs (high tariffs still applying to the products from the EU). Therefore this causes US products to be 'artificially' more competitive (whether they are made in the US at 100% of 1%).
The US economy is awash with 'cheap labour' from Latin and South America that gets no benefits, and therefore makes costs of production very low. EU is trying to do this, but the workers say from Poland are given equal rights and do get benefits too. Therefore, by using the 'grey' areas of legality, the US can have its cake - have a welfare system for its people - while eating it - not applying it to everyone who contributes to the economy.
That said, the question needs to be asked about the sustainability of the two systems.
Squeezing people whether they be trade partners or workers dry today, need not be the best solution in th elong run. Neither is getting rid of workers and replacing their earnings with a few pennies as dividends from shares they bought, and whose money was used to finance oversea ventures. The Domestic market needs to be kept alive too. Sooner or later the FTA will extend to the EU too, so the advantage the US has not will just fritter away.
In sum, the US is more competitive because of the focus of the aparatus on profits now, whereas the EU seems to take the view that people matter more (than the US thinks). The US system leads to more competitiveness today, but whether that will be the case in the longer run is a different matter.
2006-11-20 13:01:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by ekonomix 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
One major thing that the US has going for it is the mobility of its workforce. It is easy and more common for people to move across the country to start a new job, that way when an area gets depressed the workforce will move to another where there is work to be found. This is much less common in Europe-partially because of language barriers and other social factors.
2006-11-20 10:39:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Charlotte C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the US is more competitive because we would rather see our children starve and our people on the streets due to outsourcing rather than have our consumption goods made in house. Our companies would rather pay children in 3rd world countries or the illegal immigrants in our own country than give respectable men and women the jobs with an appropriate salary and insurance.
Our companies will eat their own young for a dollar. There's your answer!
2006-11-20 16:33:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by TrixyLoo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Productivity, prices, quality, delivery times, customer service - all better in the US than in most parts of the EU
2006-11-19 09:07:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by rakesh18uk 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I would say the E.U is hampered by too many anal rules that dont suit all of the countrys involved.
The Americans tend to let nothing stand in their way of a profit therfore they will usually have a much better deal for the business customer.
2006-11-19 08:09:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the US productivity rate is higher. we may take 2 weeks vacation a year, while many countries in the EU take 5-6 or more. they just don't work as hard.
2006-11-19 14:44:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robert P 2
·
0⤊
1⤋