English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And if so, did God need to hit the assistant director Jan Michelini twice during the production of this movie???

2006-11-18 17:16:28 · 9 answers · asked by dennnison 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

9 answers

I think that was god's way of saying "get off this high mountain.. and that high cross with no surrounding trees." Just like he says when you decide to climb a telephone pole in the middle of a thunderstorm.

2006-11-18 17:24:30 · answer #1 · answered by CheezyYumYums 3 · 1 0

How can HBK be Jesus whilst he had a feud with 'Jesus' some years in the past? lol so as which would be JBL - The Wrestling God. lol only kidding yet heavily no i do no longer evaluate them to be the God or Jesus. Its wrestling no longer cricket the place we would have Gods :P @the persons asserting Hogan - properly what separates Hogan from Shawn and flair is that Hogan wasn't stable interior the ring whilst Shawn Michaels and flair are *almost* as plenty frequently occurring as Hogan yet in addition extra complete in ring performers. no remember how super Hogan replaced into yet to call him a wrestling god you will would desire to contemplate the wrestling ability + acceptance! you are able to no longer basically evaluate acceptance.

2016-12-10 11:36:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

God was obviously pissed off about something. Further, I don't think you should be questioning a Deity known to hit people with lightning.

2006-11-18 17:25:07 · answer #3 · answered by Kim 4 · 0 0

I don't think God is this petty....if that were the case why hasn't anyone making blood and gore movies, pornos etc. been struck?

2006-11-18 17:18:30 · answer #4 · answered by Pie's_Guy 6 · 1 0

Yes, this did happen therefore it was God's will

2006-11-18 17:18:03 · answer #5 · answered by spanky 6 · 0 1

Hopefully. Irony in that.

2006-11-18 17:17:58 · answer #6 · answered by Illegals Are S*** 3 · 0 2

What the hell are you talking about?

2006-11-18 17:17:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

well, it's obvious he wasn't protecting them from anything

2006-11-18 17:21:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

no

2006-11-18 17:17:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers