English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

ummm. i would say they are both equally important. they do go hand in hand.

2006-11-18 16:24:06 · answer #1 · answered by carriec 7 · 1 0

That's not a choice, his health and safety are a 2 for 1 deal.

2006-11-19 00:28:24 · answer #2 · answered by Amanda D 3 · 2 0

One is just as important as the other... because a child's safety from a dangererous situation, also includes>>> safety concerning the danger of an unhealthy situation.
In other words>>> a child could be in danger of falling out of a tree & being killed... or be in danger of getting pneumonia & dying from it.

2006-11-19 11:45:51 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

well, those 2 things go hand in hand, don't they? But if it came right down to it, I suppose their safety. Because if they're unsafe, something could possibly happen to them that would jeopordize their health. I love my child SO much that I don't think there is a choice, I always want her to be safe and healthy.

2006-11-19 01:00:19 · answer #4 · answered by mandilynn72 2 · 0 0

If a child is not safe, it will effect his health, so I think they kind of go hand in hand and are equally important.

2006-11-19 00:27:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They're both important. I would say safety would include caring for their health as well as for their welfare.

2006-11-19 00:30:44 · answer #6 · answered by nobluffzone 5 · 0 0

If a child isn't safe then their health is at risk. And if a child is seriously unhealthy then they're not really safe. They're one in the same.

2006-11-19 01:00:15 · answer #7 · answered by aas_627 4 · 0 0

Neither. What's most important is your child's sense of Ninjaness. He, for you must have a son or the child should be aborted, will need this when he must avenge your death at the hands of the Grammar Nazis. Oh it will be sweet when you look down and see him rip a man's heart through his anus (the guy's...not your son's).

Oh, feed him lots of tacos so he can grow up big and gay...just like his father.

2006-11-19 01:06:55 · answer #8 · answered by das_nigga 1 · 0 1

I'm curious why you are asking this.

Obviously both are very important. It would be ridiculous and dangerous to say one is more important than the other!

2006-11-19 00:56:50 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

If a child is unhealthy, mentally, emotionally, or physically, then I say they are not safe. Don't ya think.

2006-11-19 00:25:14 · answer #10 · answered by Stargazer 1 · 1 0

Both are about the same .Neither one is more important .

2006-11-19 00:31:26 · answer #11 · answered by IT'S JUST ME ! 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers