2006-11-18 11:56:53 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
and the inoccent one tried to stop the other and called and reported his twin
2006-11-18 12:18:17 · update #1
The other is an aider and abetter in the incident
2006-11-18 11:59:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, technically, when a Siamese cat kills a mouse, it's not considered murder. In fact, most people reward their kitties for killing mice. And just because 2 Siamese kitties are born on the same day, that doesn't mean they're twins... rather litter-mates.
So, I don't think your scenario would hold up in court... UNLESS one of the Siamese kitties had rabies and then bit somebody... nah, even then, the cat would just be put down.
:-) :-) :-)
2006-11-18 22:53:07 · answer #2 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a somewhat interesting question. The other twin would obviously be an accomplice or conspirator to the act. Has such an act ever been undertaken?
2006-11-18 20:06:32 · answer #3 · answered by david42 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
how could one commit a crime without the other one at least being an observer? One will do time for the crime and the other will do time as an accessory. But more than likely it would be their first time so they would not be jailed, but the tag might be put on maybe their ....ummm...joint leg.
2006-11-18 20:06:16 · answer #4 · answered by sophieb 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you run into lots of problems with investigation if identical twins have the same dna. You hope your brother or sister confesses to prevent you from going to jail, but if they are selfish enough to have killed someone in the first place, hope you have a solid alibi.
2006-11-18 20:06:30 · answer #5 · answered by Satsune 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would have to think that there is a rule or some sort of law in place that each would either responsible for each other's actions or they couldn't be prosected as one. In that case, which twin did it, if the DNA is the same?
2006-11-18 20:01:56 · answer #6 · answered by tdakpj 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'll leave it up to the Supreme Court....
Or Law and Order. They'll probably tackle the question soon.
2006-11-18 20:57:32 · answer #7 · answered by joannaserah 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is the probability of that happening? be serious. I cant believe that people took this question seriously and is actually answering this silly question.
2006-11-18 20:35:23 · answer #8 · answered by Jaime T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both. The other is an accessory after the fact?
2006-11-18 20:13:32 · answer #9 · answered by Kelly45 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
and just when was the last time you heard of that happing? when you think the questions could not get more stupid here comes another one
2006-11-18 20:13:03 · answer #10 · answered by BLOODHOUND 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋