the old day equivalent of the Tardis
2006-11-18 10:03:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by alex_rccrd 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
It was huge! And also 3 floors. It was near impossible to tip over and was almost the size of a football field 3 floors over. Tiny? I don't think so.
Also, many burrowing animals would not need to go on the ark, they could have easily burrowed themselves into holes and covered them to remain in hibernation while the flood was there. The point is, if you don't know how its done, don't assume, but do try to get the facts straight before you strart mocking something you know nothing about.
Otherwise you fulfill the old proverb: "It is better to be silent and thought a fool, than to speak up and remove all doubt."
2006-11-18 10:13:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by AdamKadmon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Noah took baby animals, there would be lots of room. The Ark was made of gopher wood, termites don't like it.
2006-11-18 10:06:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Noah was a pioneering geneticist and actually took DNA samples of the animals and stored them in his lab for the duration of the flood.
As the bible was written thousands of years ago, they didn't have the technological language to describe his methods so they skimmed over the details.
2006-11-18 10:11:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Wandering Blade 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
As with all religion, chrisianity is a collection of lies put together to control people. Why just pick on the story of the ark for particular ridicule it is all fantasy
2006-11-18 20:31:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by S G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to the bible the ark was 300 cubits long, 30 cubits , and 50 cubits wide. anyone know how long a cubit is? and noah only took animals, not insects.
2006-11-18 11:25:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
how do you know it was tiny all that was found was some bits of petrified wood. how can someone tell if wood is petrified anyway ? And you know how the Giraffes fitted in They stick their head through that hole in the roof REMEMBER!!!
2006-11-18 11:10:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by keny 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I asked this question in the religious section, my point was that there was no way you could fit millions of species on one boat.
The christians answered by saying that there were less animals back then and they were smaller. Sounds like they have issues!
2006-11-18 10:10:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
he cremated them of course plus the ark was small but was 100 Ft tall with a rolls royce engine
2006-11-18 10:16:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by robbie 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
The ark in question was massive....big enough to house a hell of a lot of male/female animals...
Which Ark are you thinking of.???
2006-11-18 10:10:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by blissman 5
·
1⤊
0⤋