English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i'm talking about a joint US, UK, FRANCE , RUSSIA, CHINA simultanious nuclear strike! 50,000 warheads!!!

2006-11-18 05:32:38 · 35 answers · asked by jockfisatwat 1 in Politics & Government Military

35 answers

I admire your cander for asking such a question, you must be a glutton for punishment!!!! To achieve what you are purposing you would first have to deport all citizens who are from the middle east from the countries who are going to strike. Then after all this upheaval you would need to organise a massive multinational nuclear strike. This is a massive up taking and quite frankly there are far,far too many innocent non terrorists who will be annihilated! Stupid proposal!!!!!

2006-11-18 05:43:15 · answer #1 · answered by Andrew H 2 · 6 1

That would stop terrorism from the Middle East, the problem is it would also stop the rest of the world from having babies, and the blast would probably obliterate most of southern and central Europe (including the UK and France) and a huge part of Asia, that and the US and Russia would never fire their arsenals, apart from that it is a completely workable plan

2006-11-18 06:49:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

There really isn't that many terrorists. Al Queda says they have 12,000 (about the size of the Bloods) and Iraq might have 10,000 the Taliban probably really don't exist (just people claiming to be Taliban), and maybe 20,000 are surrounding Israel, but that's about it. Once you realize that there are one billion Muslims in the world, those groups and combined are smaller than the Crips, you will probably see that they are just an anomaly.

2006-11-18 15:14:54 · answer #3 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0 0

Haven't you guys done enough?
A preemptive strike is also known as a war of aggression to those of us who don't speak Newspeak.
What you are suggesting is the murder of billions so that you can feel all safe and cozy. What you are suggesting is being the aggressor. Worse, in fact, than Hitler.
Now turn off your television and pick up a book once in a while. It will do you good.

2006-11-18 06:02:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

That would be an act of terrorism in itself, so it would not sort out terrorism. The terrorists are the secret service departments of the governments of USA, UK, Israel, and Pakistan. If terrorism is to be sorted out, then these departments must be closed down.

2006-11-18 15:47:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

lol brain washed thats exactly the attitude the world bank ie the iluminati,new world order want you to think so you go along with there plans to enslave the people ,7/7and 9/11 were self inflicted we have open boarders ,corupt justice system soaring criminality,more drugs on the streets all done on purose so us the people except it when our primeinister who works for us ?passes laws which take the peoples rights and liberty and people except it because it makes us more safer?were being shafted and it goes back centurys ,our whole society is based on lies and coruption .people need to wake up or sadly we are going to pay the price for falling a sleep and thinking our governments is working for us when in reality it couldnt be more differnt.

2006-11-18 06:28:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

And why would you want to do that except if you are a mass murderer of innocent people. Remember USA and GB was hit from inside the country. Meaning the people where residing in the country. Now bombing the US,UK etc could take out more terrorist.

2006-11-18 05:45:01 · answer #7 · answered by chersgaz 4 · 4 0

why no go the whole hog
kill any body that is not white and English speaking
then we would be all set to start the human race again on the right footing in the image of god and good
at the same time global warming will be alleviated
as there will be a lot less people to pollute
so do get started with your mass bombing
there must be a flaw in your plan
cannot see it at the moment
but it can be put right as we go along

2006-11-18 06:18:55 · answer #8 · answered by SH1T 3 · 1 1

Does anyone posses critical thinking skills anymore?

Terrorism is a figment, a catch phrase to paint anyone we don't like with. It used to communism, but since the fall of the USSR it really doesn't hold as much water anymore.

You can't kill terrorism as it is only terrorism from our perspective. From their perspective, they're freedom fighters. You can't kill an idea with a bomb.

Or to put it another way, what you're asking is similar to asking should we have nuked the entire state of Montana to end the threat of the Unabomber?

Doesn't really make much sense now does it.

~X~

2006-11-18 05:49:49 · answer #9 · answered by X 4 · 5 0

To sort out terrorism is very easy, Muslims tell us everyday but no one seems to listen.
1) Sort out the mess the British created in Palastine
2) Change foreign policy to stop screwing the rest of the world.

2006-11-18 05:57:50 · answer #10 · answered by By Any Means Necessary 5 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers