This is a very vague question, and veritably impossible to provide a blanket answer for. No one person's definition of "true love" will be applicable to someone else; everyone has their own hopes, aspirations, values, and expectations of what "true love" is. Some have found themselves very happy with one another, very much in love with one another, and not committed to each other. It does happen. Romanticists would have you believe that unless you have the "ideal relationship" (two persons in love, committed to one another), then love can not really be achieved. The truth is, no one can define love for you except you.
2006-11-18 02:21:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How could a love without any "strings attached' be true ? When there is a true love the man would love to protect and provide for his beloved, and would like his family to be carrying his name. Love without any "strings attached" is pure selfishness, and that is not called love at all. Look up the definition of love in your dictionary or in the search engine, to get some understanding of the meaning
2006-11-18 02:28:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by pooterilgatto 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you may distance themselves from an emotion and nevertheless do a loving act, yet distance does no longer mean the emotional context does not exist. If i'm emotionally traumatized by somebody and that's what i'm feeling each time i'm around them, it does no longer mean i won't be able to be brave on there behalf or merciful or beneficiant. i'm going to offer them love without feeling the classic deep compassion that love is greater often than not observed by. that does no longer mean the compassion isn't there, yet that i'm faraway from it at that element. Likewise i'm extraordinarily specific you will discover thoughts linked to something we experience strongly approximately. those issues that have value or fee on your existence will generate the main thoughts. Does that propose love is an emotion? in no way. fire is often observed with gentle, yet gentle and combustion are 2 extremely some issues. To presume they're is a elementary logical fallacy. Love is likewise a variety and a philosophy. Does that make emotion a philosophy? I doubt it. (nonetheless with some peoples doubtless infinite emotional drama, i could be stressful pressed to disprove it.) so as that leaves the question 'do you may desire to worth something deeply to like it? confident, i think of you do. that's no longer logical to take a place your self deeply in problems with no value. as a result fee is usual and thoughts will holiday the gambit on that fee. only as married couples see love and compassion only as in many circumstances as Anger and massive frustration and melancholy.
2016-10-04 02:40:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by geddings 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Still? Does that mean there was before and now there isn't? I knew a friend who loved a man so much, they were so deeply in love but stayed geographically in different places. They keep to their professions, they remain single, they meet up on holidays, have a great time and come back to their everyday world again. They don't date others at all. They are so commited to each other in their hearts but like to continue with their very busy lives. So I guess it is possible. :-)
2006-11-18 02:24:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by happykat 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's not true love, because if it is you really want to get attached to that person. That's like having coffee without the hot water. :)
2006-11-18 02:20:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by macky boy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, and never was... true love is kinda a bunch of strings, comes with the package, anyway where'd u see true love anyway?
2006-11-18 02:20:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Paolo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it's true love - you won't consider them "strings" and you'll cherish them!
2006-11-18 02:21:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by sunny_side_up 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, if you love someone than you would want to be with this person to be able to show them and demostarte to them that you do love them......
2006-11-18 02:17:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by SHORTY 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope if you love one another then you want strings
2006-11-18 02:17:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by trader1867 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
STILL??!?! I really don't think that ever exsisted...lol....they are total opposites.
2006-11-18 02:18:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋