2006-11-17 19:00:13 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Possibly, if they're in the 500k yield range, that would be 15,000 kilotons detonating or 15 million tons of TNT. Would that be enough to trigger a nuclear winter? ....depends.
A Nuclear Winter threshold level of nuclear use is around 100 - 500 warheads, particularly if they are targetted at high carbon targets such as oil installations or coal storage areas. Prolonged period of cold and dark after nuclear war due to large amounts of carbon particulate aerosols being injected high into the atmosphere would kill most of the earth, i suspect there will be some survivors. ...those in deep shelters with 1-2 yrs of provision or isolated settlements that are self-sustaining.
Consider Tasmania. As an island in the southern hemisphere, nuclear winter effects would be minimised. It has large hydropower capacity for providing heat and power, and the large sheep population could help tide the modest human population through a failed harvest.
2006-11-18 08:41:20 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but it is enough to poison about 2/3 of the earth with radioactive fallout.
2006-11-18 03:02:06 · answer #2 · answered by jerofjungle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depend on the yeild of the nukes
2006-11-18 04:02:22 · answer #3 · answered by supremecritic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Naah. People will survive, but there will be some nasty side effects from all the radiation.
2006-11-18 03:02:21 · answer #4 · answered by מימי 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
man do u live in afganistan? watcha trying to counquer the world? u a terrorist or sumtin' ?
u have a sick mind anyway?
2006-11-18 03:12:21 · answer #5 · answered by @leX 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's not find out, vote for people with skills in diplomacy, vote democrat.
2006-11-18 03:10:01 · answer #6 · answered by david n 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
may be if they r powerful enough.....
2006-11-18 03:02:22 · answer #7 · answered by coocho 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋