What can we do to save endangered wildlife?

Question

There are so many species that are endangered because of us! Isn't there anything that we could do to save them? Oh, and please don't just give links! I hate that!

Answer 1

We should follow the principles of sustainable living and create awareness amongst all. We need to teach people about importance of saving animals. Creating awareness will surely help a lot and if you practice conservation and sustainavle living principals that will be a good step forward.

Each and every animal has some work in our ecosytem and we need to understand its importance and let people also understand this. It has been seen that animals were always given lot of importance in local cultures, cultures which we are forgetting and if required we can use this as a tool. In India Tiger is revered as vehicle of goddess Durga by Hindus, Water God by some and as our ancestor by some. This way all cultures in the world give importance to animals and if this ideology can be used in good way it will surely help a lot.

Answer 2

Isn't as bad; some new species do appear, although one can not expect new elephant or whale, but there are new types of birds and insects. Species come and go. Well, actually one could await for a fish to turn into some mammal, but we might rather want to leave that to tomorrow's genetics.

The idea behind the conservation of "marginal" species like elephants, whales, etc. in a nonforgiving world like ours, is not of emotional nature, but that we could learn from evolution which has been undertaking lifeforms ever since the first day. This may help us one day, or may not... if we intend to survive tomorrow, but certainly animal conservation does not harm anyone but the handful few who seek neurotical short-term profits.

Practically, there is nothing we can do but play with the last remaining numbers, while subconscious-collectively depleting our planet. The bigger problem is the increase of human population, which seems unstopable. Water supply is becoming a strategic resource, and we still haven't started changing. We are still polluting it any way we can reach.

The only answer to your question is to decrease the number of human population. Perhaps with the decrease, there might enter some quality to the neurotical perceptions. How do you think that decrease could be done?! In China they have been trying... Could that be applied anywhere else?

There is a theory about the necessity of wars, if I remember correctly, from Klauzeritz... People don't take him seriously. But, pretty soon people will kill each other over water.

One day we will go too, and there might be just time enough for some new lifeforms to flourish on this planet... The end will come anyway.

Answer 3

the project is, you should honestly discover your own documents. The polar undergo replaced into further to the record those days and its not endangered in any respect. The inhabitants has higher from round 12k in 1974 to 25k in 2001. The polar undergo isn't drowning like the global warming freaks keep spouting. although, there are a range of species that are adversely effected through the addition of roads by way of their habitate, noisy human interest close to their nesting grounds, unintentional outcomes from human structure and leisure events. you may start up off with someone elses documents, yet i'd propose checking the numbers earlier you purchase into it. some species only couldn't adapt and evidently grew to develop into extinct without guy's help.

Answer 4

I think we should start saving our papers so they can stop chopping more woods from these animals habitat.

Answer 5

Seriously, the only way would be to not have humans on earth.

Answer 6

use resources responsibly, and quit having sex irresponisbly, and listen to a wise Pope who ays USE BIRTH CONTROL!

Answer 7

Don't vote for republicans.