Well any human being of course will say that is not...But since Israelis are practicing it for such a long time it seems that for them is perfectly OK...
I think we all saw that for Israel and US the murder of 19 innocent people who were sleeping in their beds is perfectly justifiable...So I really don't think they care for a child who was run over by a tank...since they will find even a justification for it:the kid was throwing rocks at the tank so the soldiers killed him in "self defense"...It's really,really sad...
2006-11-18 04:20:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tinkerbell05 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, who in their right mind would walk in front a moving tank (ground guides aside), and if the kid was "too young to know better", where were its parents, or any other thinking adult for that matter?
Second of all, I heard that this happened in Korea (the girl was 14 and still couldn't figure out not to run into the street 3 feet in front of a moving tank), and the driver got in some serious ****, I according to the version I heard, he ended up doing time with the military, probably Leavenworth.
2006-11-17 21:29:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by desiderio 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Posting these kinds of questions up is a waste of time. Dude, you have a ridiculously large amount of republicans here on Yahoo! Answers that will most likely tell you exactly what you DON'T want to hear. You posted that up so people could give you the answer you wanted. Something like "ya its so totali rong".
There could be millions of reasons why that kid got run over. Could be an accident. Could be on purpose. Could be that the kid was suicidal. Who knows? Only the kid can tell you and he doesn't seem to be talking much these days.
Give it up, no use fighting on here. The liberals and radicals are outnumbered. Doesn't mean they should be giving up, though.
2006-11-17 16:44:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Alula 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hmm, did the kid have a grenade or an AK47? I will slay an enemy (disregarding gender, race, and age) by any means possible if they would raise a weapon or angry fist at us. If they happen to be in a tank, so be it. Don't waste that .223 bullet that would cost the government an extra $.25 or so, the enemy is not worth that much.
2006-11-18 03:28:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tim 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What was the Palestinian kid doing? That makes the difference. A kid planting a sachel charge on a tank will kill you and your men just as a 30 year old man planting a sachel charge on your tank.
If the kid was a noncombatant and it was an accident, then it is regretable.
If the kid was a noncombatant and it was deliberate it was murder.
If the kid was a combatant it is regretable, but lawful (aka OK).
2006-11-17 16:37:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
no, AND THAT'S NOT ONLY WHEN IT IS A PALISTINIAN KIID. It is the same with an Israeli kid, an Iraqi kid, Afghan kid, yours and mine. No killing is right whichever way it happens. But some soldiers are brave fighters, they are out there to fight it out - not hiding among innocent people. These brave soldiers kill innocent people by accident, while those fighting cowards pray to God that some innocent civilians will be killed - not neccesarily by their enemies , even by themselves, they will still pray to God their enemies will get the blame. Are you with the kids, the brave soldiers, the cowards, or the peace loving live and let live people of the world?
2006-11-17 16:49:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by seeker 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
nicely. do no longer you think of consistent with threat the driving force grew to become into in simple terms purely a sprint scared by way of fact he grew to become into being attacked via a gang of rock throwers? consistent with threat if the detrimental harmless Palestinian boy had no longer been area of a gang attacking the driving force this by no ability might have handed off. Israel haters are each of an identical. You scream "Israeli settler runs over 2 little ones!" yet you go away out the considered necessary reality that the driving force grew to become into being attacked on the time. it form of feels a sprint suspicious that there have been a team of adults status around with cameras. virtually like they reported "whats up little ones pass throw rocks at that automobile and we will stand right here and take photos in case he freaks out".
2016-10-22 07:11:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by freudenburg 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you don't get in front of it, you don't get run over. Are Palestinians really so stupid as to try and block a 20 ton steel monster with their bodies now.
2006-11-18 01:32:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by netnazivictim 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is it equally OK for a Palestinian terrorist to throw a bomb onto an Israeli bus full of innocent women and children?
2006-11-17 16:37:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Source?
I don't thinks its ok to harm any innocent person.. However if the kid was a combatant, suicide bomber or such I think it might have been ok..
But wow, getting ran over by a car... Getting ran over by a tank... Ouch!
Post your source...
2006-11-17 17:01:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Shadowfox 4
·
1⤊
0⤋