English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok i came up with this scenario. Allies, United States, Europian Union India,Tawian,Brazil,Canada,Mexico,Monnacco,south American, British Commenwelth, japan, south korea, Isreal and Turkey.
Vs.
The Eastern Allence, Iran,Pakistan,Iraq,Bangledesh,China,Russia,Syria,Lebenon Afican Union,Yemen,and Panama.

Major Neautral Countrys, Saudi Aribia,Jordan,Vietnam,Cental America Countrys,Indionesia,and Laos.
Plus a third alliance undeclared to eather side. Venizula,Columbia, Chili,Columbia, and Haiti. The Undlecared side allince will fight both the sides in farious places. The will fight the Eastern alliance for contoll of the panama canal and the Allies for purto rico, Key West islands virgin Islands, Jamaca and french gurani.

My main questons about this are do you aggree with this scenario and what are the odds that something like this wil happen. And if you agree that there can be 3 sides in war. Thanks

2006-11-17 16:24:39 · 9 answers · asked by Chard P 3 in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

Neutral countries win because they've got Saudi Arabia and Jordan, and they have most of the oil, and could win by cutting off the supply to everyone else's tanks and economy... If they can keep the U.S. and Israel out long enough or blow the derriks and stop the whole damn show. It would probably work: the Iraqis managed to destroy most of their oil production before the US invaded, and I bet the Saudis watched that rather closely.

The neutrals and the easterns would join forces because they share the common goal of defending against US imperialism. The combined strength of the US, Israeli and EU armed forces would just mop the floor with the other sides anyway, if they have oil to power their weapons. African Union is organized enough to defend themselves in meaningful ways, but we'd beat them anyway through brute force in a fair fight.

Panama is definitely going down. The US will want to keep the canal under a friendly government to move troops, even if its neighbors see it as a target too. There would be a similar three or four way battle over Suez, and both of them would probably be rendered useless to prevent it from being used.

Venezuela would be much more important after the conflict because they would be the only oil producer not in direct conflict with the US.

As for the odds of this happening, I don't see why it would. We're friends with the African Union, bangladesh isn't that evil, and the Saudis would probably be happy selling everybody oil and staying out of the fight. Countries besides Panama want Panama, so that part could concievably happen, although Panama is currently good friends with the US.

And there might be a war with three sides or more, but opposing sides tend to sign treatys with people they don't really like when necessity dictates. The US and the USSR fought together to destroy the greater evil of Hitler.

2006-11-17 17:10:00 · answer #1 · answered by Wise1 3 · 0 0

An interesting scenario which definitely shows significant thought. Though curious, I think this is a highly unlikely scenario. It ignores a lot of major countries (where's China in all this?) and overstates compatiblity between them. Brazil, Mexico, Turkey, and Taiwan would not have significant reasons to join such an alliance. Iran and Pakistan don't actually get along that well, and Iran certainly has strained ties with Iraq at best. Bangladesh and Pakistan also aren't friends (something about the Pakistani's slaughtering thousands of them...). The African Union, with all due respect to those who believe in it, is in my opinion a joke; it can't even stop the genocide in Darfur, let alone engage in multi-nation war. Yemen hardly has a military and wouldn't have any incentive to fight a war like this. Panama, if it's canal is at stake would fight a war. Whatever reason they'd have to fight for their canal, especially against the United States, Japan and South Korea (which send a huge amount of material...and thus canal-crossing-taxes through Panama) would have to threaten their sovereignty, something few nations really care about doing. You can bet that Central America wouldn't stay neutral in a war with Panama and Mexico fighting eachother (notice most of Central America lies between the two of them). Venezuela, Colombia, Chile and Haiti have no reason to fight this war, and would never form an alliance whose expressed purpose is just to fight people regardless of who they are (countries don't just fight eachother for fun, most of the time anyway, and wouldn't ally if they wanted to).

So no, something like this won't happen. At least with the countries involved. Yes, there can be three sides in a war (two warring and one neutral) but more than that is not possible.

Sorry.

2006-11-17 16:34:04 · answer #2 · answered by Owen 5 · 0 0

This isn't a war between North Korea and South Korea. Just as the former Korean War wasn't a war between North and South, this is a really a war between US and China. China has a huge military with technology beyond our capabilities. Our military is worn down from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now China wants to make a play for us while we're down. Only recently has China developed a missile, the Dong Fend 21D, capable of sinking all our aircraft carriers. Addtionally,they have developed another type missile that can shoot down any and all of our military satellites. They have hacked into the electrical grid and have hacked into our most secure computer systems at the Pentagon. They have also developed a laser weapn far advanced than anything our military can offer. They have also figured out a method of poisoning most of the US population. War is approaching and to answer your question, we may lose this one and those that survive will find themselves under a communist regime. We have turned away from Jesus and have become a wicked nation. Just as the Lord punished Israel for turning away from Him so to will He punish us. Those that live will turn to Him but they will be persecuted and many will perish.

2016-05-22 00:18:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You are way off. Saudi Aribia,Jordan will be with the eastern block. Turkey will be neutral. Add Suria, Sudan & all the other Arab countries to the eastern block. Also add several central asian countries.

I doubt if there will be a 3 way war. It will be Islam against everyone else.

2006-11-17 16:37:37 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2 0

The Bible has a prophecy on end of the world - battle of Armegadon? I don't know if there will be a war between groups as you have mentioned. But one thing is quite sure - most nations/countries will die from within - it will be wars between the pro and anti extremism. Nuclear bombs will be dropped on at least three countries in the next 30 years. The final act of wiping out mankind will be by God Himself, through the acts of Nature. Look at the weather folks.

2006-11-17 16:59:51 · answer #5 · answered by seeker 3 · 0 1

The scenario might happen in World War 3 with some minors deviations depending upon the stature of the US.

2006-11-17 16:32:41 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

Big NO! You are highly hallucinating and you are feared of your ideas. Take your dose and have a rest to let you back your good mind. The world leaders only think whatever good on their countries interest which probably gained more economically than risking their own.

2006-11-17 18:22:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

my good friend, you are playing too many video games and your scenario for ww3 is a bit far-fetched. Where are Russia and China and India in this scenario ?

2006-11-17 22:17:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No It's the Muslim extremest against the rest of the world.

2006-11-17 16:31:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers