To me, people seemed to have behaved the same (if not worse) since the jesus incident. How many sons should god send as martyrs so that people start to realize that love is better than war? It may have been an efficient cult former but as a lesson to sinner... ZERO. I need to say that I'm an atheist for those who don't know me yet.
2006-11-17 11:43:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
For at least the hope factor, yes.
2006-11-17 11:45:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 13⤊ 2⤋
"How or why have been human beings incapable of being redeemed without some form of sacrifice being made?" God became no longer required to abide by utilising His very own regulation. he's no longer required by utilising something to do something in any respect. He in effortless terms chosen to be below the regulation (Galatians 4:4). He would have redeemed humanity without resorting to such severe measures yet this became His plan (Genesis 3:15; a million Peter a million:18-20) and He did no longer prefer to alter His plan. "What factor would this type of sacrifice serve?" Demonstration of His love?
2016-10-15 16:41:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God so loved the world but the world didnt so love him back! Gods mission wasnt to make the earth into Heaven, but merely call sinners to the real Heaven he is preparing for us after he DESTROYS this earth.
For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son -John 3:17-18
2006-11-17 11:57:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I see you're point. but let's look at this from anther angle...
One Doctor, One Hospital, you and a bunch of other people are having life threatening injuries. Now, there is no way that the Doctor could perform surgery on all of his patients and save them all. So was hiring the doctor in the first place worth it? Well...that depends on if you had the surgery or not.
2006-11-17 11:48:11 · answer #4 · answered by Odindmar 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
To those people who do not avail themselves of the sacrifice, it is not worth it. In order for the sacrifice to be important, a person must accept it and then repent. The atonement of Christ is like a free pass. Like any other free pass, it is worthless if you don't use it. In God's eyes, it is most assuredly important and not a waste, but part of His plan.
2006-11-17 11:54:08 · answer #5 · answered by jjb8327 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just because Jesus died for our sins did not mean that everybody would accept him and believe. God gives us free will to make the choice to accept or deny.
God does not send anybody to hell, people choose to go there
2006-11-17 11:50:41 · answer #6 · answered by Messenger 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm not an Atheist but I totally agree with you you have logical point here. I believe that Jesus (pbuh) is a prophet, that means he is a human, and God sent him to advice people not to die for their since!! then they tried to kill him!! that's all bro!!
YOU ARE 100% RIGHT
2006-11-17 11:49:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It wasnt worth it. God doesnt exist anyways. So it REALLY wasnt worth it for him to send his son. And how can he have a son if he doesnt exist. It's almost as bad as the virgin Mary.
2006-11-17 11:46:51 · answer #8 · answered by Divegirl 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
crims and sins r increasing everyday so i guess it would be right for who believes that he sent jesus to die for ur sins(i don't believe that for sure) to expect another jesus to die for the rest of the sins lol
2006-11-17 11:46:28 · answer #9 · answered by prince_o0of_darkness 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What are sins? Who's jesus?
2006-11-17 11:45:39 · answer #10 · answered by untilyoucamealong04 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
YES, or he would of never sent his son to carry our sins.
2006-11-17 11:53:53 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋