Que Paso Gringo,
With all due respect to the other participants answering this question, WHAT THE HELL IS SO GOOD AND EFFECTIVE ABOUT SCIENTIFICALY PROVEN CHEMO AND RADIATION?
Im a natural health practitioner and people who state that EDTA CHELATION its not PROVEN or not SCIENTIFICALY APPROVED are obviously ignorant and have never had the insidious deisease nor have any of their friends or relatives, and God forbid they do, cause those SCIENTIFICALY PROVEN alopathic methods surely will cause an extreme amount of damage besides burning all cells, good and bad, in the system.
I have used EDTA successfuly for Diabetics and Cancer patients along with a proper PH balance and stress control, all contributing factors to any disease.
None other than a true American Hero such as Dr. Linus Pauling have endorsed EDTA CHELATION for effective non invasive cancer treatments. Linus Pauling, PhD is the only person ever to have received 2 FULL, UNSHARED Nobel Prizes. He was one of the world's greatest biochemists and scientists. Before his death he wrote and researched extensively in the field of alternative and nutritional medicine.
For more than twenty years Dr. Pauling devoted most of his time to research and educate in the fields of nutrition and preventive medicine. He wrote and lectured extensively about simple, safe and inexpensive measures to improve the length and quality of life. In his recent books, How to Live Longer and Feel Better, he covered that subject at length.
Dr. Pauling stated that EDTA chelation therapy fits in well with his views on health care. SO IF THE ESTEEMED FELLOWS ANSWERING THIS QUESTION CAN CALL DR. PAULING A QUACK then it confirms their motives for writing such a ridiculous statement for all the world to see.
Amigo, EDTA is not normally present in the human body and is therefore, by definition, not an Orthomolecular substance. Chelation, however, is far safer and much less expensive than surgical treatments for atherosclerosis. Physicians who adhere to the protocol for safe and effective administration of EDTA, as approved and promulgated by the American College of Advancement in Medicine, integrate the results of the proven research into their chelation program.
That protocol is published in its entirety fro any medical prefsional or potential patient to review. Improved nutrition and supplementation with vitamins and trace elements is an important part of the overall chelation program.
EDTA chelation therapy makes good sense, It has a rational scientific basis, and the evidence for clinical benefit seems to be quite strong. Metallic ions play an important role in the formation of atherosclerotic plaque. EDTA removes those ions with relative safety and without surgery. Published research and extensive clinical experience show that EDTA helps to reduce and prevent atherosclerotic plaques, thus improving blood flow to the heart and other organs. The scientific evidence indicates that a course of EDTA chelation therapy might eliminate the need for bypass surgery. Chelation has an equally valid rationale for use as a preventive treatment.
Furthermore, yet ANOTHER Nobel Prize winner, and yes this Doctor also won 2 Nobel Prizes, one in 1931 and the other in 1938, Dr. Otto Werberg of Germany, who discovered that cancer is formed when the cells and tissues are "anaerobic", with out sufficent oxygen. EDTA chelation accelerates de detox process removing the excess acid in the body, thereby raising the Alkaline level or oxigen level for all functions of the body and once this is achieved, no way that any tumor, harmful bacteria, germs, parasites or fungus can stay alive in the body, it all now gets naturaly excreted by the waste system.
Therefore, the decision should be obvious, use an alternative treatment that is LEGAL and EFFECTIVE, that costs considerably less than traditional alopathic methods and DOES not cause any secondary damage to the body.
At your service if you require more information.
Live healthy amigo,
drorganico
2006-11-17 11:54:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Currently the National Center for Complementary and Alternative medicine is conducting clinical trials for Chelation Therapy for people with heart disease. You can find more information about the clinical trials, video clips, and how to participate at:
http://nccam.nih.gov/chelation/
So far there is no scientific evidence that Chelation Therapy is useful to treat people with cancer. You can read more about the process from the American Cancer Society:
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3X_Chelation_Therapy.asp?sitearea=ETO
Testimonials are an ineffective way to determine whether a treatment will work for the majority of people. The only way to determine whether any treatment . . traditional, alternative, or complementary is effective . . is through clinical trials, journals, and documented evidence. Everything else is hearsay.
2006-11-17 11:24:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Panda 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chelation therapy is the Laitril of the 21st century, or the Coffee Enema treatment of the 21st century...... All it does is lighten your wallet, and people grasping at straws want anything to be cured. Not much cures cancers -- we can keep some of them at bay for awhile, and cut some out, and be pretty darn successful. But if nothing else ever gets you -- heart attack, accident, stroke, infection--- cancer will......
2006-11-17 14:29:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by April 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The only thing that a cancer patient will lose if treated with chelation therapy is money. It is an expensive...and useless....treatment.
2006-11-17 10:42:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by levatorlux 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
There will probably be many testimonials about chelation and many other alternative therapies at:
http://curezone.com/diseases/cancer/default.asp
2006-11-17 16:08:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Earth Muffin 2
·
0⤊
1⤋