god made the world rich enough to feed and clothe all human beings.
2006-11-17 10:13:51 · 9 answers · asked by LINDA P 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Which is true but because of man's greed and need for power that it is not shared equally and all have what they require. If there was more love this wouldn't be so.
2006-11-17 10:19:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Everything in this world is perfect and there IS enough to go round and provide for all. But it is man's intervention, greed and selfishness that prevents the distribution of everything equally.
Imagine a world with no money and no ownership of anything, with everyone still doing their job for the greater good of the whole ie the whole globe - so there is no country ownership or individuals making millions - imagine we all worked becasue we belong to this planet and desired to maintain it - heaven on earth!!! That is when there would be enough to go round because nobody would have more than they actually need
2006-11-17 12:11:11 · answer #2 · answered by lit_spirit 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it means that God made enough of everything so that we could forever be functional on this planet. After all, "He made the Earth to be inhabited, not in vain."
And yes,
there
is
a
GOD!
2006-11-17 10:20:39 · answer #3 · answered by . 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES EXACTLY! Yet people say that if God existed why are there still starving people. God doesn't need to help these people because we can!
2006-11-17 11:12:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The PROFIT of the EARTH is for All.
Selfishness and Greed tends to Buch up alot of that Profit.
There for, the Rich get Richer and the---you know the "Rest of the Story".
Ditto....................................
2006-11-17 10:21:16 · answer #5 · answered by maguyver727 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Another piece of naive dogma - creationist style tripe.
2006-11-17 11:21:51 · answer #6 · answered by ED SNOW 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clearly, this alludes to the abundance of livestock and vegetation. However, there is no such thing as God.
2006-11-17 10:16:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It seems rather literal to me, I don't think there are any hidden meanings in there. It also seems rather simplistic and jingoistic.
2006-11-17 10:19:42 · answer #8 · answered by satyricon_uk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
? this is not in the bible
2006-11-17 13:27:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋