Prove it!!
2006-11-17 09:25:48 · 13 answers · asked by Evolution is dumb 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Actually, 99.9% of fossils are transitional. They developed from earlier forms, and they gave rise to later forms. Likewise, virtually all living species are transitional, the only exceptions being those that become extinct within a fairly short time. Here's an excellent site that will provide you with basic scientific information. I'm not counting on your visiting it, or reading any of the excellent articles there. I know how afraid you are of facts, But in any case, there it is for those who are honest about knowing the truth, and secure enough in their religious beliefs not to be afraid of the truth:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/
Incidentally, if you have an alternative scientific theory to propose that accounts for all the available evidence, I would be interested in hearing it. So would a lot of other people. You would become world-renowned overnight. Seems like the critics of evolution never manage to come to that point though. They just say that the most scientifically sound theory available is wrong, but don't have so much as a suggestion regarding an alternative theory.
2006-11-17 09:39:31 · answer #1 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
actually evolution has been proved wrong long ago... i don't know why people believe in such a stupid theory... there is no single piece of evidence that supports the evolution theory, everything goes against it.
2006-11-17 11:07:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look in any hollow on any mountain range in the world. When you see what inbreeding brings, then you will know. When your father is your grandfather and great grandfather and your cousins are your brothers, you will know. Look, see, observe, think, don't be a libtard and you will know. Hope this helps you find the answer.
2006-11-17 09:29:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's unprovable...however, there's evidence for it, unlike the genesis crap.
This is one atheist who loves to receive your email! Send me some of your thoughts on how rediculous I am, and I'll gladly reply. Speedy service guaranteed. Comments/Complaints/Hate speech/etc. Go to my profile, then send me a message. I look foreward to hearing from you.
2006-11-17 09:27:49 · answer #4 · answered by Seth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can't you see it? It's sitting right there next to the proof of God....Ohhhh, wait a sec, that can't be proven either!..Oh well....Guess we ALL just have to hang on our own faith!!
Peace!
2006-11-17 10:07:52 · answer #5 · answered by Tom I 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Parrot stole my link!!! Look at that one. It is an unbias, very good section on the evidence.
2006-11-17 09:43:23 · answer #6 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
same place as the proof for God. prove it!!!
2006-11-17 09:27:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they can't prove it. there is a huge gap in the fossil record. there are no "transitional" fosils. "the missing link" i'm afraid is still missing. actually, it isn't missing. it just doesn't exist.
2006-11-17 09:31:14 · answer #8 · answered by hosebroom1212 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
You can't proove anything with "content". No empirical statement is verifiable.
2006-11-17 09:27:23 · answer #9 · answered by anthonypaullloyd 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's found in a place you should visit: Earth.
2006-11-17 11:21:28 · answer #10 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋