The amount of sunlight at the poles is very low angle and only lasts about 3-4 months of the year, so the average ambient temperature is very low (today the still air was well below zero F). The ocean currents are warmer than usual - we know that - and warm moves toward cold - we also know that. But the water is warmer at the 200-900 foot level and would have to be significantly warmer than 32 degrees F to melt much sea ice. Given all of this, does the popular premise that Global Warming is melting the polar ice caps and polar sea ice make any sense? The air and water temperature would have to be warm enough to compensate for the resulting cold caused by the low angle and duration of daylight. I haven't heard anything scientific to support this but could it be, given the proximity to known active volcanoes, that geothermal activity is causing the polar melting? It would make far more semse.
2006-11-17
07:50:13
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Spud55
5
in
Environment
One undisputable fact is that SOMETHING has to be greater than 32 degrees (F) in order for all this snow and ice to melt. Regardless of how much of the sun is getting through, the angle and duration is still too low to play a major role. Data from PMEL North Pole Buoy 9115 shows that yesterday and the day before the temperature range was from 10-27 degrees (F). Sure, that's warm for the Arctic but it's still not above freezing. And remember, they're getting virtually no solar radiation right now. So this becomes a balance between melting when the conditions are right and freezing when the conditions are right. The conditions to freeze are right more frequently that they are to melt. So despite what some are saying, if you look at the data and logic, and know a little bit about climate and meteorology (I happen to), what they say is happening might be so but the root causes they're giving don't make sense. And mankind is NOT causing this. Read Dr. William Gray from CSU.
2006-11-18
02:54:14 ·
update #1