Let's discuss the issues involved in setting disk quotas from both a management perspective and a user perspective. Does it basically come down to a lack of responsibility on the part of users? Or is the management of an organization acting too harshly when they set quotas, basically assuming that users will be irresponsible?
2006-11-17 06:44:45 · 2 answers · asked by dvau11484 1 in Computers & Internet ➔ Software
Users are irresponsible, period. I can't tell you how many times in the places I've worked, users (no matter the job title; receptionist to VP) have loaded their PC's to the point of crashing with pics, stupid email cartoons and MP3.
A responsible management has to have storage policies in effect to protect their company and allow each individual the ability to us the tools supplied at their best working conditions.
This is my professional opinion. I think the Cert's state the management policy comment as I just did.
2006-11-17 06:50:17 · answer #1 · answered by ark 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It strongly relies upon on what function your servers is playing. in the event that they're webservers, then IIS6 furnish far extra preserve environment than IIS5/4 mostly by way of technique isolation and worker technique fashions. in the event that they're document share servers, then the substantial benefit could be the fee of document sharing by way of fact of distinctive transport used via Netbios in win2k3 homogenous networks. Terminal amenities additionally obtainable in all line of NT5.a million/5.2 products : XP, 2003 server, 2003 employer etc, in assessment to 2000 Servers. Be specific.
2016-10-22 06:30:34 · answer #2 · answered by titman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋