English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

When the term "nanotechnology" was independently coined and popularized by Eric Drexler, who at the time was unaware of Taniguchi's usage, it referred to a future manufacturing technology based on molecular machine systems. The premise was that molecular-scale biological analogies of traditional machine components demonstrated that molecular machines were possible, and that a manufacturing technology based on the mechanical functionality of these components (such as gears, bearings, motors, and structural members) would enable programmable, positional assembly to atomic specification (see the original reference PNAS-1981). The physics and engineering performance of exemplar designs were analyzed in the textbook NanosystemsThe National Science Foundation (a major source of funding for nanotechnology in the United States) funded researcher David Berube to study the field of nanotechnology. His findings are published in the monograph “Nano-Hype: The Truth Behind the Nanotechnology Buzz.” This published study (with a foreword by Mihail Roco, head of the NNI) concludes that much of what is sold as “nanotechnology” is in fact a recasting of straightforward materials science, which is leading to a “nanotech industry built solely on selling nanotubes, nanowires, and the like” which will “end up with a few suppliers selling low margin products in huge volumes."

2006-11-17 06:42:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nanotechnology is just in its infancy. That means among other things that 90% of the companies involved in it will not be around in 5 years. Of course in the mean time some of the stock will double and triple in price based on rumor or what not. It is sort of like playing craps. You might look at TINY as another responder suggested. But I would not.

2016-05-21 23:10:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hi. It is still being developed. No one person 'founded' it.

2006-11-17 06:30:17 · answer #3 · answered by Cirric 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers