2006-11-17 03:36:31 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
time travel is impossible
why would you slap a baby?
He will ask you why you are so mean
God have mercy on you
2006-11-17 03:40:31 · answer #1 · answered by whacky doodler 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
If you are upset with the Christian faith as a whole, then travel back in time and slap those those who perverted the message of Jesus.
Besides, if you traveled back in time and slapped the baby Jesus it would be child abuse. Once you arrived back to the present the men in uniform would be there to greet you with handcuff while reading you your rights. Which, I would dare say, you most likely didn't do to the baby Jesus before you slapped him.
2006-11-17 12:48:30 · answer #2 · answered by Ms. Balls 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Satan already did that when He (was) a baby. You don't have to travel back in time. Jesus is Returning as a grown Man. You can try to slap Him then if you dare, or are like the adversary that picks on infants? Your humor is infantile.
2006-11-17 12:33:29 · answer #3 · answered by Lukusmcain// 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
By inventing a time machine (most likely impossible) .... then programming in the correct time and place (very improbable, since there aren't any really reliable records of it) .... then fighting your way past some rather defensive parents (often difficult) to deliver a smack to a perfectly ordinary little brat.
You can't.... in other words.... Its got nothing to do with gods or any of that crap.... but everything to do with the impossibility of time travel.
2006-11-17 11:41:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If one were able to move information or matter from one point to another faster than light, then according to special relativity, there would be some inertial frame of reference in which the signal or object was moving backwards in time. This is a consequence of the relativity of simultaneity in special relativity, which says that in some cases different reference frames will disagree on whether two events at different locations happened "at the same time" or not, and they can also disagree on the order of the two events (technically, these disagreements occur when spacetime interval between the events is 'space-like', meaning that neither event lies in the future light cone of the other).[6] If one of the two events represents the sending of a signal from one location and the second event represents the reception of the same signal at another location, then as long as the signal is moving at the speed of light or slower, the mathematics of simultaneity ensures that all reference frames agree that the transmission-event happened before the reception-event.[6] However, in the case of a hypothetical signal moving faster than light, there would always be some frames in which the signal was received before it was sent, so that the signal could be said to have moved backwards in time. And since one of the two fundamental postulates of special relativity says that the laws of physics should work the same way in every inertial frame, then if it is possible for signals to move backwards in time in any one frame, it must be possible in all frames. This means that if observer A sends a signal to observer B which moves FTL in A's frame but backwards in time in B's frame, and then B sends a reply which moves FTL in B's frame but backwards in time in A's frame, it could work out that A receives the reply before sending the original signal, a clear violation of causality in every frame. An illustration of such a scenario using spacetime diagrams can be found here.
It should be noted that according to relativity it would take an infinite amount of energy to accelerate a slower-than-light object to faster-than-light speeds, and although relativity does not forbid the theoretical possibility of tachyons which move faster than light at all times, when analyzed using quantum field theory it seems that it would not actually be possible to use them to transmit information faster than light[7], and there is no evidence for their existence.
2006-11-17 11:42:39 · answer #5 · answered by nukeYOU 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What a terrible thing. Its child abuse by the way. How can you even joke about slapping a baby, even if it is Jesus?
2006-11-17 11:38:19 · answer #6 · answered by sweetie_baby 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
this is a sick twisted question. God read what you wrote and for that you may just get a slap in the future rather the past.
2006-11-17 11:40:05 · answer #7 · answered by nicole 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Try jumping into THAT wormhole, and God will close up the hole before you can fall out the other end of it!
2006-11-17 11:40:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
it is true, child abuse etc.
not to mention the whole ever seeing eyes of god (best surveillance system of the world) issue
good luck with that
hope you get your money's worth
2006-11-17 11:40:29 · answer #9 · answered by irini d 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
AUUUGHHHH!!! *fumming* u can insult my momma, and u can insult me, but DONT FUaCKING GO THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ya kno what u Will be. I curse you. u kno what they say about the curse of a Holy man, i'd watch ur back u crinkily old fig tree! u pissed off the wrong little christian taday!!!!!!!!!!!! *mumbles angily and kicks soemthing*
2006-11-17 11:44:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋