Well, I'm taking the Chinese version of Rosetta Stone. I can tell you that I won't completely learn the language like this, but it's helpful for me to have the software just for practice. Quite frankly, it's like a hobby, nothing to actually use. I would recommend it, though, if you'd like to get ahead in your language; I'm in college and trying to get a level up on the proficiency test.
Rosetta Stone, in my opinion, is not a credible source for people that might want to put this on a Resume.
Some of the pictures are weird-looking too, and this may add to your confusion of the language
Don't fall for the sales pitch. If I were you, I'd get any software, a textbook, maybe the one that they use at an Ivy League, a tape, and someone that speaks the language. These are probably cheaper alternatives to the class or a teacher. You can ask questions to whoever speaks the language to see if you're right and go from there.
Hope this helps you.
2006-11-19 18:11:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've tried the 30 day trial. For people who learn visually it is good, at least to start with. I have trouble imagining that it would be quick to become fluent with their methods.
There are debates in the linguistic community whether it's better to use a completely "natural" method, meaning the way kids learn their first language, or better to use a common language to explain the complexities of the language you are learning.
I personally think that the Rosetta "natural" method is a good way to start learning vocabulary, then gradually introduce other activities using a common language.
My 2 cents.
2006-11-17 09:49:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by rbwtexan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have that one and several others and do not recomend any of them to anyone.
It is so much better to either find a native speaker that also speaks your language well or find a good class teaching situation. Some can learn by using computer programs but it is so much better when you can actually ask questions of the teacher.
There are a lot of these programs out there and if you have no other way then you may have to give several a try.
2006-11-17 10:30:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you must have been reading their website. It isn't the absolute worst, but was pretty outdated even 20 years ago. They only use one method to teach a language. No matter what the language, you would probably be better finding something online, even if it costs a bit more.
2006-11-17 09:36:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Love Shepherd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not really that good. I had the Turkish version and although I learned some vocabulary "naturally", it was nothing that I could actually use in a conversation.
2006-11-17 11:19:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by flores.alaranjadas 2
·
0⤊
0⤋