2006-11-17 01:21:33 · 4 answers · asked by atl 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Since its creation after WW2, some of the world gov's havent ever accepted it, some even chose a race for arms just to prepare what they thought waas a good cause to be against it. I cant think of why we pay for such a mess. Yeah, I dont think ALL of it is a mess...but it does need to reform and scale back.
2006-11-17 01:36:37 · answer #1 · answered by Diadem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im a star wars fan-so this is similar to how they set up their senate. i believe everyone, even unfavorable countries, need a seat in the UN. We need stronger leadership and more accountability from countries-the UN convoys r considered jokes by those "unfavorable countries"-so i thinkthat problem should be resolved-most countries are more powerful than the UN-thats like a state being more powerful than a federal govt or a kid being more powerful than a parent-not good. so, there is a long way to reform the UN. Jus no Sith Lords-haha
2006-11-17 02:50:21 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There must be NO United international locations in any respect! They over step their boundries. Like telling Texas they are able to't execute human beings on death row. The U.S. desires to get out...and tell the UN to get out of usa. usa will pay greater into it, and recieves much less reward and 'say so.' there is not any reliable reason to have it in any respect.
2016-12-30 13:59:39 · answer #3 · answered by burley 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Years ago it was nine. But I don't know about now.
2006-11-17 01:28:47 · answer #4 · answered by sheeny 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋