English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-16 21:24:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation Aircraft

7 answers

No, but it has a small RCS

2006-11-17 11:36:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Good answers. And it's always worth remembering that what is super high technology today is tomorrows old 5Mb drive the size of a washing machine.

Systems will be developed to locate Raptors at 200 miles. If your ECM goes active then a careful enough observer will get a bearing from your emissions, over time that can be used to work up a range, or at least a locus of possible ranges. ECM is very subtle now, but I'm sure they thought that 20 years ago...

There have been claims that some stealth aircraft were visible to unusual frequencies, but the ground guys like to make the air guys feel uncomfortable and when they claim detection it's not always true.

8 miles is way close for a modern aircraft. The Su30 MKI expects to detect an F-16 at 100 miles. The Raptor should detect even further out.

2006-11-17 02:49:30 · answer #2 · answered by Chris H 6 · 0 1

Nothing is invisible to enemy radar. What stealthy craft do is minimize the radar returns by actively or passively reducing the radar cross section. The cross section changes by radar type and distance to the target. At 100 Miles the F-22 has the detectable cross section about the size of an insects (less than .01 meters). But at 8 miles the SU-30 can track/identify this as a target. At 4 miles it will get a radar lock and can shoot it down.

So invisible is never a good word to use. BTW Stealth comes from the ancient Greek "to steal" and not anything to do with being invisible.

2006-11-17 00:43:34 · answer #3 · answered by Drewpie 5 · 3 1

All the real data is secret, it is assumed that the Falcon with it's ECM was able to process a signature of a sparrow. As enemy radar gets better that is assumed to alter. The ECM is then given the task to re-reduce that signature. Given the Raptors cost and new-ness it is probably what you are thinking. Think of how different the original Apple IIe is from the the G5 Dual. A 5 Meg Hard drive was the size of a washing machine in 1980 now a 800 gig is hand held. Invisable one minute, phase shifting the next, multiplying the next.... placing a bomb in the enemies lap, next!

2006-11-16 21:40:49 · answer #4 · answered by SweetDeath! 3 · 1 1

So forget approximately the stealth features of the F22 it is purely a right now on canine combat superb? based on the wing loading and thrust of the two jets, the EF would in all probability have the ease, yet with thrust vectoring interior the equation, i won't be in a position to think of the Raptor would not be waiting to decelerate and turn interior the EF with out difficulty. think of appropriate to the dimensions of the wing on the Raptor, it particularly is extensive!!! in case you place television on a wing like that, it particularly is gradual velocity dealing with features would be off the charts. Even overall performance smart, the Eurofighter won't be able to experience the F/A-22 in sustained supersonic overall performance. The F/A-22 could make one million.seventy two mach with out afterburn. The Eurofighter could make one million.2-one million.3 mach with out afterburn. interior the BVR section, the F/A-22 dominates. The F/A-22's radar is a effectual AESA. The Eurofighter is at the instant utilising a pulse doppler radar and could now not recieve AESA till later. merely my 2 cents. yet interior the tip like quite some human beings be conscious of, it comes all the way down to the pilots. If the f22 pilot makes an blunders or would not use the raptors features to his benefit the ecu will win. the two airplane are dazzling.

2016-12-17 11:32:50 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

^^^ that guys lieing dont listen to him they arent invisible they are fighter aircraft not stealth

2006-11-18 10:18:23 · answer #6 · answered by markus 1 · 0 0

Yes it is. It has unique materials that make it that way.

2006-11-17 13:17:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers