100% yes
That law had nothing to do with the shariah in the first place.
A great injustice has been undone Alhamdulillah.
2006-11-16 17:22:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
As a non-Muslim right this is my take. All weren't rather countries initially--in assessment to, say, India, Iran, or Egypt. they actually had no historic past of freedom and democracy, and the colonists-imperialists did no longer help plenty the two. i assume the non secular justification is in the "greater suitable stable," or dispensation arguments. no longer that each and every physique Muslims purchase it--yet possibly maximum Muslims do no longer purchase the countless unique arguments interior any considerable faith that some will use. evaluate the burkha. maximum Muslim women human beings disguise as much as a level. some substitute into strolling tents. some would placed on bikinis if that they had the main appropriate. each and every have their argument. a minimum of a few from each and every team possibly have stable ones. So that's with violence. i assume maximum Muslims are reactive--do no longer injury except you have been injury--and objective the violence to the perp. some, in spite of the undeniable fact that, are possibly so pacifistic, you will desire to chilly-c-o-c-ok them, and that they might respond with "Peace be upon you." yet there are others who see terrorism as part of a divine plan have been the "widespread" policies do no longer practice --certainly that they are required to commit such acts. finally, there are those, who're the two finished, or partial, fakes who will act Muslim, yet are not--a minimum of no longer thoroughly. wish that enables. :-D
2016-10-15 16:00:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by andry 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see how this is a matter of religion. Rather, it's a matter of what's right a fair. Obviously something needed to be changed since the statistics on rape in Pakistan is disgusting. And obviously when you're raped, you won't conveniently have 4 men around witnessing it and willing to testify to it. The old law was ridiculous, midieval, and just plain wrong.
2006-11-16 17:36:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Absolutely YES
2006-11-16 17:30:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by LeScorned 3
·
6⤊
0⤋
Of course. You would have to be a fanatic or a monster to disagree.
It is a shame on us all that it took this long for the amendment to be made. The application of Sharia laws to rape and adultery are an embarassment to Pakistan.
2006-11-16 17:25:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
i agree. They twisted a verse in the Quran to fit their agenda to be able to rape women and then put the women to death if they ratted. Now, it goes by physical evidence. THe verse they used says to bring four witnesses. They conveniently left out the fact that this is for ADULTERY, and NOT RAPE. THere is a hadith about it. If a woman is raped, the man is tried and then stoned to death. The woman, the innocent victim, goes free. The fact that the law now relies on physical evidence is even greater, and is completely islamic. Even better than before, becuase Islam says to find truth in everything as much as possible. Here is the verse and the hadith.
Narrated Wa'il ibn Hujr:
"When a woman went out in the time of the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) for prayer, a man attacked her and overpowered (raped) her. She shouted and he went off, and when a man came by, she said: That (man) did such and such to me. And when a company of the Emigrants came by, she said: That man did such and such to me. They went and seized the man whom they thought had had intercourse with her and brought him to her.
She said: Yes, this is he. Then they brought him to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him). When he (the Prophet) was about to pass sentence, the man who (actually) had assaulted her stood up and said: Apostle of Allah, I am the man who did it to her.
He (the Prophet) said to the woman: Go away, for Allah has forgiven you. And about the man who had intercourse with her, he said: Stone him to death.
He also said: He has repented to such an extent that if the people of Medina had repented similarly, it would have been accepted from them. (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 38, Number 4366)"
[024:004] Flog those who accuse any of the chaste women (of committing adultery), but fail to backup (their charges) with four eyewitnesses. Flog them with eighty lashes, and thereafter do not accept their testimony ever again. Surely, they are the wicked ones.
[024:006] And, if someone accuses his wife (of adultery) and has no witnesses other than himself, then let his testimony be treated as that of four witnesses. (Let him testify four times, saying each time that) he swears by Allah that he speaks the truth.
2006-11-16 18:41:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Rape law bring it on coz i am 100% wiv it...Let justice be served
2006-11-16 18:46:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Farhan 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes. They aren't done; rape needs to be dealt with in criminal, not civil, courts.
2006-11-16 17:28:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes definitely!
the old Law was not fair and not Islamic.
2006-11-16 17:30:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
I'd have to say that I do because now we have science, etc. to help give extra evidence.
2006-11-16 17:24:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by husam 4
·
3⤊
0⤋