ok first question is there sum law out there that prohibets people from making there own version of the bible
and my second questionis if theres not i want to wright a bible that has my belifes my frends belifes and every ones belifes mixed into once big book like my frends belive that Jesus was not spered sence it is only metioned in one gosple so i would like leave that out and other belive that there could not posibly be a vrigan birth so i switch that around it not like rewiting history it like trying to make it more relistic type thing so i was woundering if u could give me sum stuff that you belive that happened or did nto happen in the new testament please and thank you and yes i no a few people will probly hate the idea and say you should keep it the way it is what's done is done but i wanna get more people interested in religon even if that means you ahve to twist some stuff around
sorry about the spelling in this part no spell check in it
2006-11-16 15:24:34 · 14 answers · asked by Tyler 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
ok it's only the new testement and my spelling better when it's not 2 in the moring and not rushing to get to sleep aand im only adding and swiching stuff that makes more sence like if sumthing appers in 3 out of 4 gosples in puting in there im not starting from a clean slate and rewiting history im just summerizing it so you don't ahve to read for gosples and readprety mucht he same thing
2006-11-16 17:24:10 · update #1
The Apocalypse Of Saint John
Chapter 22
16 I Jesus have sent my angel, to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the root and stock of David, the bright and morning star. 17 And the spirit and the bride say: Come. And he that heareth, let him say: Come. And he that thirsteth, let him come: and he that will, let him take the water of life, freely. 18 For I testify to every one that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man shall add to these things, God shall add unto him the plagues written in this book. 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from these things that are written in this book. 20 He that giveth testimony of these things, saith, Surely I come quickly: Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.
21 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.
2006-11-16 18:34:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Contrary to the misconceptions of some of the Protestant answers above, the bible actually doesn’t specify exactly which books should be in it (Revelation is referring to itself as “this book of prophesy”, not the whole bible), so add and remove what you want. You are also free to change the text you don’t like since that has already been done when they complied the NT and they hoped no one would notice. So go ahead and twist some stuff around, I’m sure your version will make more sense than the popular one.
2006-11-16 23:47:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is what screwed the whole thing up in the first place. People putting their own twist on Gods words.Acording to God it There is a law. You are not qualified because one has to be in an unbroken chin of disciplic succession from the appearance of Christ to translate. BUt Not misenterpeit. thats bogus
You can't even spell how are you going to write the Bible rascal Go to http://www.stephen-knapp.com for universal truths
2006-11-16 23:47:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not, Thomas Jefferson did? Jefferson thought that Jesus had proposed an excellent ethical system, so he left that stuff in. However, he was opposed to the religious dogma of Christianity and he did not believe in the supernatural claims about the Christian God or his miracles, so he left them out – just as he left them out of the US Constitution.
In Jefferson’s own words:
•“I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition [Christianity] one redeeming feature. They are all alike, founded upon fables and mythologies.”
•“It is not to be understood that I am with him [Jesus] in all his doctrines. I am a Materialist.”
2006-11-16 23:48:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tyler you are doing (writing a bible version) what people did after the original bible was written. The bible has many false statements in it written by men over the years. But there is much truth in it along with the false statements.
2006-11-16 23:38:14 · answer #5 · answered by Xfile 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
You probably will leave this out but just thought I'd warn you.
2006-11-16 23:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by thstuff9946 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Read Revelation 22: 18 & 19. that will answer your question about writing a new Bible.
2006-11-16 23:35:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There isn't a "law", but other churches will call you blasphemous. You can start whatever religion you want. Go ahead. Let me know when you finish your "bible", it might be interesting. I personally wouldn't follow it, but I'd like to hear your opinions, when you use spellcheck.
2006-11-16 23:34:29 · answer #8 · answered by teeney1116 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You couldn't call it a bible. It would just be a book of your beliefs and your friends beliefs. Sounds like you want a religion of your own design, so in essence you worship a god that you invent in your own mind. I won't be buying your book anytime soon.
I prefer to worship the actual God.
2006-11-16 23:34:07 · answer #9 · answered by Felicitas 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
In the Bible it says you cannot rewrite your version of the Bible. The Bible is Truth and the pathway to him.
2006-11-16 23:38:25 · answer #10 · answered by Lore 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋