2006-11-16 13:33:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Animals must not be neglected like what Bush did but instead concentrated in the invasion of Iraq.
2006-11-16 13:36:53 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well now, lets see if we can put a few things in perspective for those among us who are the truly imbecilic, moronic, ignoramuses who think GWB is stupid.
Shall we compare what a stupid guy has done to what any of you have done - don't worry this will take about a second.
Here is a guy who, out of of 300 million people, has been selected twice to lead the country and who serves in the most powerful position of anyone in the country.
The USA is the most powerful, both economically and militarily, country on a planet with over 6 billion people on it. Does that make him the smartest guy on the planet? Probably not. Does it make him smarter than you? Without a doubt.
But let's continue. Shall we?
While you might consider him stupid, he was apparently smarter than the 100 million or so democrats who tried to defeat him in his last 8 elections. Plus, he received higher grades in college than the latest 2 liberal candidates threw up against him.
So, if according to you he is stupid, how has he also accomplished all of these things against people who you must consider smarter than you or why would you vote for them?
I would challenge you to take a look at your own pathetic, monumentally insignificant and truly worthless life and tell us all what you have accomplished in a way of even the most remote comparison.
The purpose of the question is to find exactly where YOU must inevitably rank on the intellectual scale in comparison since you have virtually nothing, either in your past or future, which will come close to a single one of gwb's accomplishments?
Looking at it that way, if you consider him stupid and he has accomplished all of these things, it must kind of make you feel about as insignificant and worthless as a drop of water in the worlds oceans. Or, to put it in terms you can relate to, a piece of cow sh*t in the middle of a 100,000 acre pasture.
2006-11-16 14:45:24 · answer #2 · answered by basscatcher 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Starving elephants?
2006-11-16 13:35:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Excuse me. I drove alot of those elephants around in my taxi.
They are by no means starving. Hell, they aren't even really elephants! Thats what happens to people when they've been allowed to suck at the government tit too long.
2006-11-17 13:59:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The President of The United States is not responsible for feeding elephants.
You are the one who sees the problem. What are YOU doing about it?
2006-11-16 14:34:14 · answer #5 · answered by JAMES11A 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
since the elephants are all repiublicans, they aren't starving. they stole enough to feed themselves steak and lobster three squares a day for the next 100 years.
2006-11-16 13:38:08 · answer #6 · answered by de bossy one 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Whatever you're smoking, STOP IT.
In a few days your head will cear & your brain MAY start working again.
If Not, I hear the DNC may need a new chairman...
2006-11-16 13:42:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't worry.
He's got Kathrine Blanco and Ray Nagin working on it
2006-11-16 13:36:19 · answer #8 · answered by why? 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush blew up the towers you think he cares about elephants
2006-11-16 13:34:54 · answer #9 · answered by BLAKE T 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
i think the caramel haze is distorting your vision
2006-11-16 13:37:26 · answer #10 · answered by seb 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋