English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

position, which one u think you will have more success in, assaulting an army held position or a marine held position? lets say they both have the same arsenal.

2006-11-16 08:27:13 · 7 answers · asked by Beaujock 1 in Politics & Government Military

7 answers

Let me see, I am in the place of the enemy of the U.S.A.
OK, I've imagined that.

I am scared out of my mind.

I surrender.

2006-11-16 08:36:24 · answer #1 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 3 0

Depends. The arsenal is unimportant if the soldiers or marines manning it don't have the training to use it. A tank is worse than useless if all you have are supply troops. Marine infantry would hold better than Army mechanics, and Army infantry would hold better than Marine cooks. It all depends on the training they had received.

2006-11-19 03:55:53 · answer #2 · answered by Just Me 2 · 0 0

either one would be a death trap unarmed or lightly armed and definitely outnumbered in both chances, id pray id never be stupid enough to believe that one anyone would care if i gave my life for them, or since most of them are male that i would get 12 virgins at the pearly gates(no im not making that up they actually believe that)..there arent enough drugs in the world to make me that stupid...

2006-11-17 03:34:30 · answer #3 · answered by stardust792004 3 · 0 0

this is an ignorant question that incites bashing of services.

2006-11-16 16:33:14 · answer #4 · answered by The Tin Man 4 · 3 0

The enemy would not have any success on either position
and that is a fact, Jack!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-11-16 16:47:18 · answer #5 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 2 0

Does it matter? either way you get to die for your stupidity..

2006-11-16 16:36:02 · answer #6 · answered by XX 6 · 2 0

Im not sure but it would be a helluvu fight!!!

2006-11-16 16:33:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers