I read the artical on yahoo, and I want to know what people think abou it
2006-11-16 07:41:10 · 8 answers · asked by james w 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
If I lived in a city where they required or recommended that I needed a gun, I would move to a safer city. I live in a city were I don't feel I need a gun to be safe.
2006-11-16 07:48:54 · answer #1 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That is good because the police can't be everywhere
and owning a gun will make the criminal think twice about robbing and killing a innocent person.
2006-11-16 15:46:52 · answer #2 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's great. It worked in Kennesaw, Georgia. Their crime rate plummeted.
I have a gun, and I know how to use it. I will not be afraid of criminals in my own home. Nor anywhere else for that matter - I also have a license to carry a concealed weapon.
2006-11-16 15:43:09 · answer #3 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Consider if one of your loved ones were threatened, wouldn't you want a lawfully endowed gun-carrying citizen to protect them if there were no police around?
Florida recently passed a nice piece of legislation regarding gun-ownership, and the right to defend oneself.
2006-11-16 15:47:11 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like a good place to live!
2006-11-16 15:48:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well if some cities ban firearms why can't some cities require ownership??
2006-11-16 15:48:00 · answer #6 · answered by NuncProTunc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish every city was like that.
2006-11-16 15:43:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
they have my vote
2006-11-16 15:51:16 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋