English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should "m" be in lbm or slugs?
Should "A" be in in/sec^2 or ft/sec^2?

2006-11-16 07:30:36 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Engineering

5 answers

There are several wrong answers in the preceding.
These are correct:

(lbf) = (lbm) * (acceleration in g)
(lbf) = (slugs) * (acceleration in ft/sec^2)

1 g = 32.174 ft/sec^2
correspondingly
1 slug = 32.174 lbm

If you know acceleration in in/sec^2, the corresponding unit mass would be 12 slugs or 386.09 lbm. This unit does not have a popular name that I am aware of.

1 lbm = .45359 kg
All conversions are approximate

2006-11-16 10:28:40 · answer #1 · answered by AnswerMan 4 · 2 0

Since 1970 every country in the world (except three) has used metric measurements.

The SI units are:
F - Newtons (N)
m - kilograms (kg) and
a - metres per second squared (ms^-2)

But if you insist on using caveman units, mass should be in pounds (lb) and acceleration should be in feet per second squared (ft/s^2)

2006-11-16 15:35:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

(Pounds force) = (Pounds mass) * (feet/sec/sec)

A slug = roughly 32 pounds (mass).

To convert from (inch/sec/sec) to (feet/sec/sec), multiply by 12, since there's 12 inches to the foot.

2006-11-16 15:35:14 · answer #3 · answered by CanTexan 6 · 0 1

d unit 4 mass is ur name pls if u want to know give me a call at dis number 990283263635332372382

2006-11-16 16:17:20 · answer #4 · answered by Maro E 3 · 0 0

if u use lbs then ft/sec^2

slugs in/sec^2

2006-11-16 16:15:01 · answer #5 · answered by ? 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers