which is better???
2006-11-16 07:09:48 · 13 answers · asked by The Wayfarer 6 in Beauty & Style ➔ Hair
l'oreal is better than pantene but garnier fructis is better than l'oreal and redken is better than garnier
2006-11-16 07:23:54 · answer #1 · answered by GAgirl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since I don't use either, I'd say neither. But if I have to chose, I pick Pantene. At least I know the effects of that one.
2006-11-16 07:14:40 · answer #2 · answered by M'lady 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pantene
It protects the hair really well
Try the pantene ice range, it's good.
2006-11-16 07:12:05 · answer #3 · answered by don't stop the music ♪ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
L'Oreal not pantene.
2006-11-16 07:12:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pantene! o yes!
2006-11-16 07:10:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't go for either one! They'll damage your hair. Seriously.
Ask your hairdresser for some really good hair care products instead. You might pay a little more, but they'll last longer and help your hair in a long run.
2006-11-16 07:15:59 · answer #6 · answered by Rulla 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither, they both have silicone properties that clog the hair and make it dull thats what my hairdresser says...personally i dont like either of those, i prefer john frieda brunettes or laminates(from hairdressers magical shampoo and conditioner)....i have waist length hair and it looks fab using them the moment i use pantene it looks crap and it gets greasy quicker...
2006-11-16 07:15:52 · answer #7 · answered by sadie 69 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
shampoo from pantene and conditioner from l'oreal.....yeahhh the stufff...try it
2006-11-16 07:12:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
pantene, they rock and the first album was awsome.
2006-11-16 07:12:49 · answer #9 · answered by KU 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
personally l'oreal
2006-11-16 07:11:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋