the answer to the FAMOUS QUESTION : WHO CREATED GOD ???

Question

a lot are asking
who created god??
b4 i give u an answer

i wanna ask u
why u r asking abt the origin of god ??

that means that u r beleiving that all these things MUST have an origin & only one ORIGIN
I havent said that
but ur question proved it

u said who created god ??
asking for someone
not a group of ppl nor a group of GODS


i know this thought is very strange & many may not got it

but i hope i describe in shortly & in good english


I WANNA KNOW : WHATS UR OPINION ABT THIS ANSWER ??
& if its not right
wats the right answer ??????

Answer 1

man create god

Answer 2

A number of sceptics ask this question. But God by definition is the uncreated creator of the universe, so the question ‘Who created God?’ is illogical, just like ‘To whom is the bachelor married?’

So a more sophisticated questioner might ask: ‘If the universe needs a cause, then why doesn’t God need a cause? And if God doesn’t need a cause, why should the universe need a cause?’ In reply, Christians should use the following reasoning:

Everything which has a beginning has a cause.1
The universe has a beginning.
Therefore the universe has a cause.

It’s important to stress the words in bold type. The universe requires a cause because it had a beginning, as will be shown below. God, unlike the universe, had no beginning, so doesn’t need a cause. In addition, Einstein’s general relativity, which has much experimental support, shows that time is linked to matter and space. So time itself would have begun along with matter and space. Since God, by definition, is the creator of the whole universe, he is the creator of time. Therefore He is not limited by the time dimension He created, so has no beginning in time—God is ‘the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity’ (Is. 57:15). Therefore He doesn’t have a cause.

In contrast, there is good evidence that the universe had a beginning. This can be shown from the Laws of Thermodynamics, the most fundamental laws of the physical sciences.

1st Law: The total amount of mass-energy in the universe is constant.
2nd Law: The amount of energy available for work is running out, or entropy is increasing to a maximum.
If the total amount of mass-energy is limited, and the amount of usable energy is decreasing, then the universe cannot have existed forever, otherwise it would already have exhausted all usable energy—the ‘heat death’ of the universe. For example, all radioactive atoms would have decayed, every part of the universe would be the same temperature, and no further work would be possible. So the obvious corollary is that the universe began a finite time ago with a lot of usable energy, and is now running down.

Now, what if the questioner accepts that the universe had a beginning, but not that it needs a cause? But it is self-evident that things that begin have a cause—no-one really denies it in his heart. All science and history would collapse if this law of cause and effect were denied. So would all law enforcement, if the police didn’t think they needed to find a cause for a stabbed body or a burgled house. Also, the universe cannot be self-caused—nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, which is a logical absurdity.

Answer 3

This isn't a cell phone. Type correctly.

Second, your logic is completely flawed.

How do you come to the conclusion that, if someone asks of the origin of god, they actually believe god is real? When someone claims that god created everything and nothing except god is absolute or constant -- how can that be? Don't you think that that's just an easy answer to get around the explanation of a supreme being? Why can't the universe be a constant? Why can't there be a beginning of a god, hence a creator of a creator?

Aside from that, whatever it is you were trying to say didn't make any sense.

Answer 4

>> why u r asking abt the origin of god ??

Because 'god' is the solution YOU give when we ask 'what created the universe?' That doesn't solve the problem. That just moves it up a level.

>> not a group of ppl nor a group of GODS

I don't assume that at all - in fact, I give that as a counterexample to your solution. For instance, it sounds like a lead-up to a joke, but how many gods would it take to create the universe? Maybe it needs 20 gods. Maybe it needs an *infinite* amount of gods. That certainly shoots down your monotheism theory.

Answer 5

this is the priority in answering the query. As GOD is known-approximately in Christian words. The Jewish faith from which Christianity is a sect of calls the author via many names. The Self Created One, the classic of Days, Yahweh and Jehovah. GOD is a extra contemporary be conscious for asserting those names translated via the Christians sort the Jewish Torah and the letters and Epistles of the apostles.that's a lump sum call that for all of the different names

Answer 6

I am agnostic, but if there is a God, we must fist look at one of the basic rules of physics that governs our Universe. It has been said that God is light and love, the force that governs all other laws of nature, these things exist as a type of energy, in our universe energy can neither be created or destroyed, only changed. With this being said then God would indeed be that of an everlasting thing that has and will always be here is some form or another.

Answer 7

God always has been, and always will be. I don't find a reason to question that. Just because it doesn't seem logical to you, doesn't mean its not true. The average human being uses only 1/10 of their brain, so humans are really not that smart. We have more questions than we have answers for. I could ask questions all day long that we have no answers for, but that doesn't mean they aren't truth in them, because we have no answers. I hope this helps. Good Luck!!!

Answer 8

If you say that not all things must have an origin, then there is no need for God. The concept of a god does not explain anything, is not falsifiable, and therefore is superfluous and must be disregarded as per Occam's razor.

Answer 9

No no...not strange. You make a valid point; why question God's origins if you absolutely do not beleive in him? And if you do beleive in him, still, why care where he came from...I think thats what your statement meant, and if so, I agree. I don't see where you answered the question though, (or how you could), or were you asking people to answer, because those replies should be pretty interesting...

Answer 10

Human's need to blame and explain created God.

Answer 11

Keep hoping - cuz you failed miserably...

WTF is your argument? Most people ask about the origin of GOD on this site because the gross majority of people here are christians - who only BELEIVE in one God. So, why would I go asking Christians about multiple Gods?? Christians BELEIVE that the entire universe's origin is only one source - God. Thats why we questions them about it... They purport that we are all creations of God, so we ask in return who created their God. Doesnt mean I beleive he is real....