And if your ex's did, but a new gf didn't would you want her to have one done?
Just wondering.
2006-11-16 03:05:48 · 24 answers · asked by Clare 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Tramp stamps are totally gross. So many girls have them nowadays that you're making a statement by _not_ having one.
2006-11-16 03:07:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's all down to individual taste really. A tattoo shouldn't make too much difference to how much a guy fancies you unless he has a tattoo fetish. Some men like tats and some don't. So I would say never get a tattoo done just for the sake a guy. Its permanent remember.
2006-11-16 03:19:01 · answer #2 · answered by lauracowie83 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
although tattoo is forbidden in my religion, I must say that girls with tattoo across her lower back does turn me on! Anyway, this depends on an individual though. As you can see the reply that u receives before mine, some guys doesn't really like them. But if my new girl doesn't have one, I will not ask her to have them as although its a turn on for me, its still always just a plus and not mandatory. Girls are still attractive as they are even with or without a tattoo. Just my humble oppinion... :)
2006-11-16 03:12:36 · answer #3 · answered by sliver 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is up to the girl weather she wants a tattoo or not. I could not force her either way. I don't mind if someone has or has not. OK I big tattoos a no no, perhaps just a small one on the lower back.
Either that or nothing
2006-11-16 03:34:43 · answer #4 · answered by sija_uk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its just shallow if a tattoo defines how much a person likes someone. They should like the person for who they are, not because of a marking on their skin.
2006-11-16 03:24:21 · answer #5 · answered by grudgrime 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do like tattoo on the lower of girls backs but it wouldnt bother me if a new girl didn't no.
2006-11-16 03:08:08 · answer #6 · answered by ross s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it all depend on the reason behind the tattoo if you do not like tattoos don't do it because you are in love what will you tell your gran kids
its like a friend of mine who got so drunk while on hols and tattooed f**k off *** kissers on his bum.
now he has kids he is thinking of removing it times the 8pints cost times 200 (not worth it)
I asked him what he would do if his grand kids saw that ?
he had it removed the next day
the morale do not do it if you do not want to
2006-11-16 03:15:38 · answer #7 · answered by john n 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have a tattoo across my lower back of a rose with my kids name in the ribbon, i get a lot of comments about it some good some bad.
2006-11-16 03:08:46 · answer #8 · answered by crazylady1193 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i myself have a tatoo on my lower back of an angel to represent my daughter. A tatoo should be something personal to yourself i would NEVER do it for someone else its on your body and your the one who has to live with it regardless of what anyone else thinks !!
2006-11-16 05:11:57 · answer #9 · answered by bettyboop 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in a word no .
I do see them as art , If you body was supposed to be a piece of paper or art pad , then we would have eraser fingers .
And is for if my ex did and me new didn't ??? then No again as mainly a change is as good as a rest.
2006-11-16 03:56:08 · answer #10 · answered by DARES 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahh, the "tramp stamp". They aren't as popular as they used to be. And personally, I could care less. A lower back tattoo doesn't make anyone more or less attractive. It only deverts attention.
2006-11-16 03:08:25 · answer #11 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋