2006-11-16 00:17:11 · 19 answers · asked by Yankee Jeebus 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yikes! I'm too white and too female to be anywhere near you, looking like that. LOL
Guilty, fer sure.
2006-11-16 00:52:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Guilty, of course.
Michael Jackson is guilty, too.
Goes to show how much it helps to have lots of money and influence and popularity. You can pay the media, the government, the lawyers, the prosecuting attorneys, the judge, the police, the FBI, the CIA, the jury, everybody. And, believe me, EVERYONE has a price they can be bought with. O.J. and Michael are very wealthy....
need I say more?
2006-11-16 08:40:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably guilty,but it doesn't really matter because neither of the victims was anyone the world will miss.A little gold digger and her little boy toy that OJ helped pay for.
2006-11-16 10:38:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think he is guilty. he had a lot of money so he was able to get good lawyers to get him off. if it where one of us, we would be in jail for life. as far as the glove, the cops put that glove there and that is why it did not fit.
2006-11-16 08:20:32 · answer #4 · answered by lover of Jehovah and Jesus 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There's a difference between being not guilty and being innocent.
2006-11-16 08:29:54 · answer #5 · answered by Debra D 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Of what? Stupidity? Of murder, I don't think he's that intelligent. Besides, those deaths generated over $6 billion on government funds for shelters. Clinton wouldn't sign the Violence Against Women Act because of the severely bias nature of the language in the act, but after the killings, he had no choice. Perhaps they were killed as martyrs to a greater cause.
2006-11-16 09:00:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Its pretty obvious he's guilty, but the police overstepped their jurisdiction and contaminated the whole investigation. So I can understand why he was set free.
2006-11-16 08:25:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
ummmm
lemme think
he writes a book called "If I did it"
not only is he guilty of murder, he is guilty of gloating about it
God have mercy on his soul
2006-11-16 08:22:34 · answer #8 · answered by whacky doodler 1 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Not guilty
2006-11-16 08:18:25 · answer #9 · answered by rinah 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Not sure. But maybe if you write a book about it, you'll make some money to search for those "other" killers. Just an idea.......:)
2006-11-16 08:42:00 · answer #10 · answered by <><><> 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋