Yes if it would cause peace. The arabs do not in their hearts want the elimination of all jews - only some think they do. The jews have as much right to be in the middle east as arabs. The region is avestan and the israelis are very much avestan. They were there in ancient times, why should that change now?
2006-11-16 01:11:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I assume your meaning 67 borders. Yes, but the only exception I would make is the Old City of Jerusalem that should at least be a neutral area.
This is considering that not only will he Palestinians disarm but also if every Arab nation signs a peace treaty with Israel.
This is unrealistic because it will never happen. The Palestinians had another opportunity of good faith when Gaza was given to them. What was the result? More rockets launched at Israel than ever before.
Its been proven time and time again that land for peace dose not work. Peace can only be made if BOTH sides truly want it and are willing to give and take. As long as this dose not happen their will be no peace.
2006-11-16 13:59:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gamla Joe 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
NO--while some Israelis might support this --all anyone need to do is take a look at Gaza to realize that this conflict is not about land.
It is about eliminating all Jews from the middle east.
Take a look at this map and tell me how this conflict can be about land!
When folks get a perspective on the real size of this country compared to the 22-23 Muslim countries that surround her--you will see how land for peace is a joke.
One might also want to remember that this border was offered prior to the 1948 war in what was called the partition plan which the Jewish people excepted even though they had no access to the Old City but the Arab world rejected.
This and more was offered by Barak just a few short yrs ago and rejected by Arafat--why? Because peace and a homeland is not what they want--they want only the extermination of the Jews.
No other country in the world has to allow dailey rockets to fall on her and then restrain their reaction according to world input.
yet--the US was hit once and went into two countries to make war for the past 3 yrs.
During the time (up to 1967) that Jordan controlled East Jerusalem and the Old City and other areas of Israel--how is it that not one word was ever uttered demanding that Jordan return the land to the Palestinians?
Again--its not about land..........................
http://www.masada2000.org/geography.html
2006-11-15 22:46:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by toda1 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
for 2 significant motives, neither having to do with Apartheid: (speedy notice: Druze Arabs are drafted into the IDF, so your declare isn't completely precise.) -at first, this form, Israeli Arabs are actually not compelled into circumstances the place they could could combat, or maybe kill, their Arab cousins. -Secondly, even with being Israeli electorate, many Arab-Israelis are antagonistic to the country, and would not hesitate to tutor over techniques they learn from the IDF to its enemies (methods, preparation, troop positions, and so on.) even with the indisputable fact that, in the event that they so elect, Arabs can serve, although they are not legally compelled. regularly even with the indisputable fact that, Arabs who do connect the IDF are perplexed via their fellow Arabs and consequently elect to stay nameless whilst giving interviews, and so on. i'm no longer rather specific what approximately this methodology ability that Israel is an Apartheid united states of america.
2016-10-22 04:34:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not think the Istraelis will agree to
withdraw to the 1948 borders, but this is a very difficult question
and you will probably get different answers.
2006-11-15 20:39:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Josephine 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I should hope never!!!!!!!! It has already been proved with Gaza and some of the West Bank, that giving land for peace does not work. Israel has tried it and it failed.
2006-11-17 11:47:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Shossi 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I'd agree to have 2 states, divided by the Jordan.
2006-11-16 15:04:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by ysk 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes probably. But I would like to negotiate for more than just those concessions.
2006-11-15 20:06:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by adphllps 5
·
1⤊
2⤋